Archived One country that won't be taking Syrian refugees: Israel (latimes.com)
submitted ago by TheDude2
Posted by: TheDude2
Posting time: 4.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 642
SCP: 39
40 upvotes, 1 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
Archived One country that won't be taking Syrian refugees: Israel (latimes.com)
submitted ago by TheDude2
Sort: Top
[–] Kattie 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
They know from experience what it's like to have Arabs in your country. They aren't dumb enough to bring in more.
[–] Spark_Plugg 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
In the same sense that native Americans know what its like to have Europeans in your country
[–] TheDude2 [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
http://newobserveronline.com/clinton-destroy-syria-israel/
What price is Israel paying for something they created?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
Sending Israeli troops into Muslim lands like Iraq and Afghanistan? Yeeeeaaahhh. Think about that one a minute.
During the First Gulf War Israel even refrained from retaliating against Saddam's scud missile attacks because the US knew it would inflame the Arab street in Arab countries aligned with the US.
Sending Israeli troops into Muslim countries would be a monumental act of idiocy strategically speaking.
And that, my friends, is why they haven't contributed troops.
[–] CRKT_M16Z 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Iran hasn't taken in any Syrian refugees either. So.....?
[–] ratsmack 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Looks like they're a little smarter than the rest of the world.
[–] Maxcactus ago
Great idea.
[–] faissaloo ago
Tbh, that's probably best for them, there's a hell of alot of racism towards Arabs in israel, they'd probably get a crap ton of abuse right after being in a war zone, and no doubt they would react badly because of it.