You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
13

[–] rwbj 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Nope. The TITLE of the first link is "12 Famous and Super Rich White Men who married Black Women."

This 100% a social justice troll at work.

0
4

[–] The_Cat 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So "white", "man" and "woman" are all in there, which are the three unique words that search term is searching for.

0
2

[–] rwbj 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Searching just by naive key word matching is technology of about two decades ago. Now a days even the most basic search engine is going to have a grammatical understanding that can understand and match nouns/verbs/adjectives.

This is not a bug. It's intentional internal sabotage.

edit Eg - search for "red triangle and red triangle" and then search for "red triangle and blue triangle".

edit2 Or for instance search for "man running" vs "man running late." On keyword match the first is a subset of the second, yet in actuality the results are entirely different due to a grammatical understanding.

0
0

[–] rudditrenbyfascists 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

But I can Google search successfully for way more obscure shit.

Sounds like a lie to me.

0
3

[–] x2501x 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Actually, a lot of the images that come up in that search come from this one article, which is specifically against the idea of black men dating white women.

http://www.eurweb.com/2015/07/the-black-hat-10-reasons-why-black-men-shouldnt-date-white-women/

0
2

[–] fagnig 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This 100% a social justice troll at work.

Or yknow, just /pol/ making sure its always right.