You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Empire_of_the_mind ago 

The argument is that no checking into his story was done after he was detained. If they had done a cursory search on him and found him making threats to attack the candidate and be a martyr they may have seen cause to keep him in custody for longer and possibly charge him with the threats.

0
0

[–] 4587353? ago 

Doubtful though. If he had a weapon, yes. But absent one, he is just a tryhard.