Archived Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences (whatever)
submitted ago by p0ssum
Posted by: p0ssum
Posting time: 5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 399
SCP: 9
18 upvotes, 9 downvotes (67% upvoted it)
Archived Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences (whatever)
submitted ago by p0ssum
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ElementalPee ago (edited ago)
No. But then it's a moot point in a lot of cases because in many states you can just fire anyone for no reason whatsoever. If I were boss of the world, I'd also allow a tiny bit of leeway if you're a public figure and it is expected that your social media account will be representing your employer to a substantial degree. But for the most part your facebook isn't your employer's business as far as I'm concerned and everyone is entitled to a personal life full of opinions their boss doesn't like.
[–] p0ssum [S] 4 points -3 points 1 point (+1|-4) ago
I fully agree, but if you add you boss on facebook and then bad mouth the company ... that shouldn't be cause for, at minimum, some disciplinary action.
[–] ElementalPee ago (edited ago)
Well, for my money it is inappropriate for a boss to be facebook friends with their subordinates. I know it is common these days but that should never have been the case. Some employers require it which is even worse. It's like a ceo inviting himself along for drinks with the peons on Friday and then firing them when they complain about the company. Just because communication happens on the internet doesn't mean employers shouldn't respect boundaries. Everyone should be able to complain about work and the dumb stuff their company does. Suck it up, companies.