You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
I am sure they have their hands in a lot of countries, they would be foolish not to.
Yes of course. This isn’t in dispute. But are they selling weapons specifically to other countries enemies? Are their currency manipulations designed to undercut any other specific currency? Do their generals write entire books designing a strategy around weakening ANY other countries? Their efforts are overwhelmingly concentrated on damaging the U.S., and not out of simple economic competition. They don’t see a distinction between kinetic war, economic war, and any other effort to destroy an opponent.
Your second point is refuted above, and your third is meaningless. You agree there are traitors but don’t agree they aid an enemy? The nature of it, legal or otherwise, is aiding an enemy. If it didn’t aid an enemy it would cause no harm, and so would not be a crime.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] TheDaoReveals ago
Your first point doesn’t stand.
Yes of course. This isn’t in dispute. But are they selling weapons specifically to other countries enemies? Are their currency manipulations designed to undercut any other specific currency? Do their generals write entire books designing a strategy around weakening ANY other countries? Their efforts are overwhelmingly concentrated on damaging the U.S., and not out of simple economic competition. They don’t see a distinction between kinetic war, economic war, and any other effort to destroy an opponent.
Your second point is refuted above, and your third is meaningless. You agree there are traitors but don’t agree they aid an enemy? The nature of it, legal or otherwise, is aiding an enemy. If it didn’t aid an enemy it would cause no harm, and so would not be a crime.