You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The PCR test they are using is shit. A virus probably doesn't even exist. The CDC doesn't even have a sample to test against. It's a sham from top to bottom.
PCR isn't a test it just amplifies a designated compound, the test is then performed on the results of PCR process. The sample tested against is based on a sequence around 20 units long: SARS-COV2 genome contains around 30,000.
Because the sample is so small A) it is not representing the theoretical virus in full B) the small sequence range is [shared and present in] by other types of coronavirus and possibly other cells etc too.
Again, I am not putting these forward as scientific truth, but in this world we need to speculate and solve it ourselves it seems, so I'm willing to speak and be wrong in search of a better model. Any science ppl please chime in.
A friend of mine, who works in biochemistry and genetics, said the PCR test amplifies the signal of that part of the DNA which encodes for the spike proteins on the surface of the virus. She said, it's because these are the most conserved part, since they have to always be compatible to human lung cell surfaces which arguably don't change too much from generation to generation. I am not convinced that SARS CoV II signal will not have an overlap with the common cold (another corona virus) and others which have the same type of binding spike proteins, because they infect lung cells as well.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Swiiirlyhunter 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
The PCR test they are using is shit. A virus probably doesn't even exist. The CDC doesn't even have a sample to test against. It's a sham from top to bottom.
[–] AntiMarx 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
PCR isn't a test it just amplifies a designated compound, the test is then performed on the results of PCR process. The sample tested against is based on a sequence around 20 units long: SARS-COV2 genome contains around 30,000.
Because the sample is so small A) it is not representing the theoretical virus in full B) the small sequence range is [shared and present in] by other types of coronavirus and possibly other cells etc too.
Again, I am not putting these forward as scientific truth, but in this world we need to speculate and solve it ourselves it seems, so I'm willing to speak and be wrong in search of a better model. Any science ppl please chime in.
[–] AssumingControl 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
A friend of mine, who works in biochemistry and genetics, said the PCR test amplifies the signal of that part of the DNA which encodes for the spike proteins on the surface of the virus. She said, it's because these are the most conserved part, since they have to always be compatible to human lung cell surfaces which arguably don't change too much from generation to generation. I am not convinced that SARS CoV II signal will not have an overlap with the common cold (another corona virus) and others which have the same type of binding spike proteins, because they infect lung cells as well.
[–] Swiiirlyhunter 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
They run it 40 times. Anything after 30 is amplified to the point of junk.
[–] StBlops2cel_is_Lord 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The inventor of the PCR tests says it's shit for muh Cohen 19 testing