You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] Hand_of_Node 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If every single educated voter values these parameters

I like the "educated" qualifier, but that's not what we have, nor is the accuracy of the system a concern for a large percentage of voters. Winning is the desired performance, and "thinking outside the box rules" can achieve that result.

There's a perspective out there that sees "autistically adhering to a set of arbitrary rules" as a losing strategy, and essentially crippling your chance of winning. The importance of winning is that you can then adjust the rules as you wish.

Counting the opinions and votes of every person only works in a homogeneous society, which we no longer have. Our society is now a battleground between the original inhabitants and the invaders, and the literally crazy thing is that the invaders are allowed to change our society as they wish, once their invasion numbers are large enough.

Voting is a weapon in a multicultural society, and the side that ties their hands behind their backs in the war is going to lose. The side that fires the most bullets is going to win, when the only criteria that matters is having the largest number.

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Excellent insight.

The concept of voting as a weapon in a multicultural society is so accurate.