You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The only acceptable situation I can think of is she is a widow.
That would be quite tragic. Widowed while pregnant and prior to that was planning on being a home maker. Finding one's self all alone and suddenly low income if any facing the task of raising a baby that you thought would be the first of many with your husband.
Much more likely she has some niggers bastard corrupting her womb tho.
The thing about widows is that if you have dependents, then you either bought term life insurance or both of you are retarded. It's incredibly inexpensive and means that if you die at 21 your spouse will be sitting on $1-2 million and never need to worry about resources.
Anyone who even considers children without that prerequisite is so irresponsible and low IQ that no sane person would go near them.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Floppyhorsecock ago (edited ago)
The only acceptable situation I can think of is she is a widow.
That would be quite tragic. Widowed while pregnant and prior to that was planning on being a home maker. Finding one's self all alone and suddenly low income if any facing the task of raising a baby that you thought would be the first of many with your husband.
Much more likely she has some niggers bastard corrupting her womb tho.
[–] daskapitalist ago
The thing about widows is that if you have dependents, then you either bought term life insurance or both of you are retarded. It's incredibly inexpensive and means that if you die at 21 your spouse will be sitting on $1-2 million and never need to worry about resources.
Anyone who even considers children without that prerequisite is so irresponsible and low IQ that no sane person would go near them.
[–] nougat_hater 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I concurr, not having life insurance with inequal incomes, etc in marriage with a death is a recipe for disaster