You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
9

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you're so dangerous I cancan't trust you with a firearm, they shouldn't have let you out.

If you're out, you should have all rights restored. If you can't handle having your rights back, you should be in prison.

0
3

[–] FreeBreivik 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I agree with this. Same thing with the sex offender registry.

0
2

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sex offenders can't be cured, releasing them is immoral.

0
2

[–] H3yGeorge 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sums up what I would have said. Pretty damn close to word for word.

I'd also add that weaponization of the Justice system lets the jewdiciary decide you can no longer defend yourself for the rest of your life. Add that to how hard it is just to get a job with a felony and imagine making some small mistake but being forced to live the rest of your life in the ghetto.. without the ability to own a firearm.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

0
0

[–] Glory_Beckons ago 

I can trust

I think you meant can't.

If you can't handle having your rights back, you should be in prison.

I'd argue that if you can't trust someone with a firearm after their jail sentence, then they should be dead and not in prison. No point in wasting resources to keep someone locked up in a cage until they die. That's neither merciful nor practical.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

I think the sentence should reflect our inability to trust. If a murderer is always too dangerous to ever get their guns back, then they can't be trusted with anything and should always receive life, no parole. Just one example.

Just a matter of deciding and assigning severity.