You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] remainselusive 2 points 36 points (+38|-2) ago 

Can we stop with this faggot graph until we can label the axis and get a source?

[–] spudsmcz 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

I appreciate the graph but refuse to share it without a source I can check

[–] H3yGeorge 9 points -7 points (+2|-9) ago 

Well, look at you two.

[–] NukeZionAlready 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Agreed, source for the graph is, itself based on data at, which is simply some dude combing through the Forbes 400 Billionaires list and counting black/asian/white/jewish billionaires. Choice of who counts as Jewish can be confirmed through Wikipedia of course but also by their very own Jewish Telegraphic Association boasting about it:

The graph itself sucks. It's depicting representation ratios, where "negative" means under-represented. So for instance, 34% of billionaires are jewish, but 2% of US citizen are jewish, that's an over-representation of 17x. Meanwhile 0.25% of billionaires are black, but 13% of US citizen are black, that's an under-representation of 52x (roughly). This is represented on the graph as a positive ~17 tall bar and a negative ~60 tall bar respectively. Which isn't great for representing ratios really. There are pie charts available on the same site which are more visually accurate.

[–] figtreeofshame 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

When you tell people 2% of the population account for 34% of billionaires the people want socialism but when they find out the 2% are jews suddenly you hear birds chirping.

[–] The_Red_Scare 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This^^. -1.21 what, motherfucker??? Negative billionaires???

[–] tony2shirts 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There's no need to label the axis on this graph as it doesn't provide any data points to correlate with on a typical x/y graph... it's simply a y graph with different classes.