[–] H3yGeorge 0 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Even better, the 99.99% of the population that are barely functional, room-temperature IQ NPC's declare any discussion on this "RAYCIST!".

Handing 3.3% of the value of.. 160,000,000 working people to roughly 600 individuals is the equivalent of granting each one of those 600 billionaires the entire yearly output of 9,020 people.

[–] persiangovernment 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

My parent’s generation can’t fathom why the media would lie to them so heinously. They reason that there’d be no way such a vast network of self-corroborating liars could pull it off, even if they wanted to. When presented with evidence to the contrary, it’s much easier for them to ignore one guy, rather than the entire media complex - so they don’t take the accusation seriously.

[–] H3yGeorge 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)


Whenever someone uses "conspiracy theory" I'm done talking to them entirely because it's a propaganda brainwashed reaction and they're not possible to save in almost all situations.

[–] undertheshills 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

6 of the top 10 richest people in the US are yids.

[–] EEMac 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

My mother-in-law believes TV media religiously. She tried to argue about race, politics, and "peaceful protests" for years, using talking points from The Narrative.

My husband would argue right back with statistics and first-person sources from the internet. Media lies only survive because they edit video clips so carefully. Watching the original video - of a Trump rally, of a "racist" attack, etc. - quickly reveals their lies.

He'd send her links to original video. I don't think she ever watched them. Her go-to closing line was, "Well, I just don't believe it."

She finally stopped talking about politics completely. She would rather pretend the media is trustworthy.

[–] ranjith33001 ago 

Good but need butter graphics

[–] godamn ago 

Beaten down Bernie people aren’t npcs.

[–] H3yGeorge 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

True, they're not even characters. More like non-playable items.

[–] remainselusive 2 points 34 points (+36|-2) ago 

Can we stop with this faggot graph until we can label the axis and get a source?

[–] spudsmcz 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

I appreciate the graph but refuse to share it without a source I can check

[–] NukeZionAlready 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Agreed, source for the graph is https://exposeintelligence.blogspot.com/2015/06/who-really-makes-up-1.html, itself based on data at http://racehist.blogspot.com/2013/04/2012-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html, which is simply some dude combing through the Forbes 400 Billionaires list and counting black/asian/white/jewish billionaires. Choice of who counts as Jewish can be confirmed through Wikipedia of course but also by their very own Jewish Telegraphic Association boasting about it: https://web.archive.org/web/20191210130745/https://www.jta.org/2009/10/05/united-states/at-least-139-of-the-forbes-400-are-jewish.

The graph itself sucks. It's depicting representation ratios, where "negative" means under-represented. So for instance, 34% of billionaires are jewish, but 2% of US citizen are jewish, that's an over-representation of 17x. Meanwhile 0.25% of billionaires are black, but 13% of US citizen are black, that's an under-representation of 52x (roughly). This is represented on the graph as a positive ~17 tall bar and a negative ~60 tall bar respectively. Which isn't great for representing ratios really. There are pie charts available on the same site which are more visually accurate.

[–] figtreeofshame 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

When you tell people 2% of the population account for 34% of billionaires the people want socialism but when they find out the 2% are jews suddenly you hear birds chirping.

[–] The_Red_Scare 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This^^. -1.21 what, motherfucker??? Negative billionaires???

[–] tony2shirts 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There's no need to label the axis on this graph as it doesn't provide any data points to correlate with on a typical x/y graph... it's simply a y graph with different classes.

[–] verboten 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This seems to be the source or a copy of the source:


The data seems to be quite old and uses Forbes lists as sources:


To get the numbers, you need Forbes USA for the white and Jewish billionaires combined, and Forbes Israel for the number of Jewish billionaires with US citizenship.

[–] dadudemon1 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 


Every time this shit chart is posted, no one can answer. The number makes no sense. You can't have "negative" billionaires. It's either 0 billionaires or any whole number greater than 0.

[–] NukeZionAlready 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It means representation ratio ; 2% of jews do 34% of billionaires, so 17x over-representation ratio, 13% of blacks do 0.25% of billionaires so 50x under-representation ratio. Positive bar for over-representation and negative bar for under-representation. Bar graph for ratios is a shit idea really, but the data is sound.

Source is https://exposeintelligence.blogspot.com/2015/06/who-really-makes-up-1.html

[–] dadudemon1 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Really appreciate this explanation. This line of yours is worth more than gold:

Positive bar for over-representation and negative bar for under-representation.

And that causes the whole thing to make sense.

I do stats as part of my job. Have done it for years. I can usually make heads or tails of shitty graphs in seconds. But this one had me scratching my head. But after your explanation, it makes so much damn sense that I feel embarrassed.

[–] InfiniteWaves ago 

That is the answer i was looking for, makes more sense now

[–] BW-414 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

there's an NSDAP speech about the difference between getting wealth and creating wealth. basically, the NSDAP said the jewish race's motivation is getting wealth, i.e. money lenders, merchants, etc. and the caucasian race's motivation is creating wealth, i.e. farmers, carpenters, machinists, etc. money lenders, merchants, etc. don't create or produce anything. farmers, carpenters, etc. produce goods / create wealth.

[–] wakemeupvoatz 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

We need a better graph.

[–] Splooge 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The chart leaves off trillionaires (yes, they exist) because otherwise we’d see another column populated with nothing but jews.

A good introductory redpill for normies is to point out that the Rothchilds are each trillionaires, but left off the Forbes list because they’re “European royalty.”


[–] not_brainwashed ago 

What does this chart even mean? How can you be negatively represented as billionaires?

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)