You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] totes_magotes ago 

This stupid shit of using jew tactics to try to discredit something dishonestly is old and tired.

There are 70 articles listed. It's disingenuous to post that as though it's referring to the main link, and you know it.

Be honest this time and post which article you're talking about.

0
0

[–] ReAwakened [S] ago 

I just looked at a second one and it says

Based on developing syndromic ILI, less contacts became symptomatic in the 'mask' tents compared to the 'control' tents (31% versus 53%, p= 0.04). However, laboratory results did not show any difference between the two groups. This pilot study shows that a large trial to assess the effectiveness of facemasks use at Hajj is feasible.

So you posted the link to what end?

0
0

[–] ReAwakened [S] ago 

Fair enough. I'm tired and I was sloppy. It was the first article I looked at. That said, have you read all 70 articles? Did you notice that any of the articles were essentially drafts?

0
0

[–] totes_magotes ago 

Some are. Some aren't. The articles go back to 2003. 17 years of articles and unless the entire world-wide science community is a one big giant fraud/scam, 70 articles over 17 years... Not to mention that calling the science community a fraud or similar completely discredits your own post which has links to things only going back as far as 2006 (and only 42 articles).