There is a great spiritual debate about the right to murder.
I have already crossed that line - not on my own - and not of my own independent volition - but there it is.
How do I choose to live moving forward - my version of the golden rule.
Treat others at least as well as THEY treat others.
It's fine to lie to a liar but not an honest man.
A murderer is on the table for being murdered - as long as they knew what they were doing.
This leaves me with a quandary - a line I never crossed - a question for Voat:
If a propagandist intentionally spreads lies which cause wars - is their life forfeit for all the death they caused?
I believe now - based on the state of the world - the answer is yes. If you propagandize for war - the blood is in your hands and you deserve what is coming to you.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] WorldClown [S] ago
"Somehow me asking if you would rape a rapist means I personally want to rape or that I am saying "
watch the shapeshifter change the context throughout the argument. Truly a disgusting cockroach mind.
When this person brought up rape - it was in the context of making an analogy to an eye for an eye. It was ACCUSATORY intentionally dishonest PROJECTION.
It was not - as later claimed - simply using the 'socratic method' - it was an attempt at using dishonesty to taint the argument.
This person knows exactly what they are trying to do. Thank Yahweh they aren't nearly intelligent enough to pull it off.