There is a great spiritual debate about the right to murder.
I have already crossed that line - not on my own - and not of my own independent volition - but there it is.
How do I choose to live moving forward - my version of the golden rule.
Treat others at least as well as THEY treat others.
It's fine to lie to a liar but not an honest man.
A murderer is on the table for being murdered - as long as they knew what they were doing.
This leaves me with a quandary - a line I never crossed - a question for Voat:
If a propagandist intentionally spreads lies which cause wars - is their life forfeit for all the death they caused?
I believe now - based on the state of the world - the answer is yes. If you propagandize for war - the blood is in your hands and you deserve what is coming to you.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] WorldClown [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
'Would you torture someone because they tortured another person? Would you rape someone because they are a rapist'
this came from your sick confused mind, not mine. I only stated treat them at least as well as they treat others - which to an ordered mind logically intimates not treating them worse and nothing else.
The only suggestion that someone should rape came from you - from your unhealthy mind. Making the gross jump to the conclusion that I am sick like you.
As for the rest of it - you've shown clearly you read everything through the lens of your illiterate ego.
You're an incredibly insulting person who lacks self awareness and credibility.
[–] Had ago
k. Your name suits you.
[–] WorldClown [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Your analogies seem to lack conscience.
Hou murder a murder to stop him from murdering. You lie to a liar to remove his advantage.
Why rape a rapist? It doesn't follow. Again - your mind is sick.