There is a great spiritual debate about the right to murder.
I have already crossed that line - not on my own - and not of my own independent volition - but there it is.
How do I choose to live moving forward - my version of the golden rule.
Treat others at least as well as THEY treat others.
It's fine to lie to a liar but not an honest man.
A murderer is on the table for being murdered - as long as they knew what they were doing.
This leaves me with a quandary - a line I never crossed - a question for Voat:
If a propagandist intentionally spreads lies which cause wars - is their life forfeit for all the death they caused?
I believe now - based on the state of the world - the answer is yes. If you propagandize for war - the blood is in your hands and you deserve what is coming to you.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Had ago
No. I'm someone who is trying to make heads or tails of your convoluted morality.
I don't have any issue with your willingness to kill people as I am not some Christcuck that thinks all life is valuable. A murderer should receive justice, and death is a fair penalty for murder.
I don't, however, think it is ever OK to lie in any situation, and I do not change my morals or the way I treat people based on their actions.
You are allowing the other person to control you. In a sense, you let them dictate your actions and you become their bitch. Treat everyone the same, don't let them decide how well you should treat them.
Would you torture someone because they tortured another person? Would you rape someone because they are a rapist? Where is your line? You are rationalizing poor behavior saying "they deserve it, because they did it too!" It is incredibly juvenile. Do better.
And just to answer your original query, I do think people who create and use propaganda to incite violence deserve punishment based on the severity of the violence, potentially including death.
[–] WorldClown [S] ago
Ayn Rand was a tweeker with Aspergers.
[–] Had ago
[–] WorldClown [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
'Would you torture someone because they tortured another person? Would you rape someone because they are a rapist'
this came from your sick confused mind, not mine. I only stated treat them at least as well as they treat others - which to an ordered mind logically intimates not treating them worse and nothing else.
The only suggestion that someone should rape came from you - from your unhealthy mind. Making the gross jump to the conclusion that I am sick like you.
As for the rest of it - you've shown clearly you read everything through the lens of your illiterate ego.
You're an incredibly insulting person who lacks self awareness and credibility.
[–] Had ago
k. Your name suits you.