You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Grizzible 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What happens when?...

Man #1 is a piece of shit liar and thief. He also, snatched an old ladies purse in front of Man #2. Man #2 is awesome. He helps his neighbors out, never lies, steals, or cheats at anything, But Man #2 also lives by your golden rule. When Man #2 sees despicable Man #1 acting like a fool, stealing and beating an old lady before stealing her purse, Man # 2 decides he is going to get back at Man #1, or show him some justice. One day Man #2 finds Man #1 in an alley. Man #2 beats up #1 and steals his wallet to give the money back to the old lady...

Just then Man #3 observes Man #2 beating and stealing the wallet of Man #1. Man #3 has never met the despicable Man #1 or hero Man #2, and therefore has no judgement of either, prior to the alley beating. Man #3 now believes #2 is a thug, beating up a helpless man. What if #3 decides he is going to wait a while and plot a way to get back at man #2?

Does this become a viscous cycle?

0
1

[–] WorldClown [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If you are interested in exploring this question I heartily suggest 'The Politics of Experience' by R.D. Laing.

0
1

[–] Grizzible 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thank you, I will check it out.

Edit: I just ordered the book

0
1

[–] WorldClown [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes they call it an eye for an eye we all go blind.

To avoid that cycle - two things:

  1. Follow Obama's advice "You gotta aim before you shoot, folks." - which is hypocritical from him as they declared anyone hit by their drones as de-facto enemy combatants. But it is still good advice. Evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt. Propagandists are just easy targets because they publicly damn themselves.

  2. Don't let man #3 see you.