There is a great spiritual debate about the right to murder.
I have already crossed that line - not on my own - and not of my own independent volition - but there it is.
How do I choose to live moving forward - my version of the golden rule.
Treat others at least as well as THEY treat others.
It's fine to lie to a liar but not an honest man.
A murderer is on the table for being murdered - as long as they knew what they were doing.
This leaves me with a quandary - a line I never crossed - a question for Voat:
If a propagandist intentionally spreads lies which cause wars - is their life forfeit for all the death they caused?
I believe now - based on the state of the world - the answer is yes. If you propagandize for war - the blood is in your hands and you deserve what is coming to you.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] LegitimatePen 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Propaganda seems like a grey area but I don't think it should be. People are susceptible to it and it does have effects, negative if you want them to be. Molyneux for example always focuses on the initiation of force and nothing else, what does he think about propagandist lies that lead to destruction and death? Nothing is being forced by the propagandist in that case but the results are undeniable. I think it is moral to dispose of propagandists