0
86

[–] PaperPhone 0 points 86 points (+86|-0) ago  (edited ago)

outcomes differences

These people shouldn't be in charge of teaching.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 29 points (+29|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
20

[–] Mr_Quagmire 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

*racism, classism, sexism, etc.

1
18

[–] ShoeShineJoey 1 point 18 points (+19|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Mongloidism, Negroidism, Ineptism but above all else Kikeism.

0
1

[–] Bintemcflinty 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

0
2

[–] clubberlang 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Slide outsourced to enrich Street shitters vocab checks out

0
0

[–] Plavonica ago 

Teaching is one of the lowest IQ jobs out there for a reason.

0
58

[–] 78616BC93459 0 points 58 points (+58|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So, for example, the difference in the number of prostate cancer cases between men and women is due to systemic misandry? Am I doing it right?

0
32

[–] GreenSlug 0 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago 

Men and women? MEN AND WOMEN!? Oh my god, you literal Hitler bigot! Thats so transphobic of you! What about that dragonkin xir over there!? What about its prostate!?

Lol.

0
10

[–] ImmaLueserBaby 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Excuse me, the correct nomenclature is prostrate-owners and menstruators, bigot!

0
9

[–] OogaBooga696969 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Why are you ignoring all of the women with prostates, you fucking racist?!

0
11

[–] 78616BC93459 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Wait until they hear about the gender life expectancy gap. Obviously another case of systemic misandry.

Also worth noting: men only live 93% as long as women on average, so it makes sense that women make less to ensure equitable lifetime incomes.

I think I'm starting to like this leftist bullshit.

0
1

[–] clubberlang 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

*dilated prostates

0
0

[–] Planetoftheclown ago 

Did you just literally disparage women who feel like they have prostates?

0
3

[–] Rockfish1000 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No you bigot. Misandry doesn't exist because sexism towards men doesn't exist. Men are the oppressors so they cannot experience sexism, especially not at a systemic level. It's the same with Whites. White people can't experience racism because they are the oppressive racist. Good God, man. Do you even Prog Stack, bro?

0
1

[–] puggy 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

the difference in temperature in January vs August is due to a broken weather system

1
30

[–] 8_billion_eaters 1 point 30 points (+31|-1) ago 

Call me a bigot. Call me a cracker. Call me a racist. ...it doesn't matter. You know why? Because I can call you a nigger and you will piss yourself. LOL!

You know why? Because the WHITE RACE is SUPREME!!! Hahaha... Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

0
18

[–] 24537654? 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A long time ago before I knew what the deal was, it always seemed weird to me how there's nothing you could call Whites that would make us react the same way an african would react to being called a nigger, an arab would react to being called a paki, chinese a chink, jew a kike, etc. Then it dawned on me, we don't care because we know innately that we're superior.

0
12

[–] Rockfish1000 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

I know what ya mean. Even the word "Cracker" is short for Whip Cracker. They are legit calling us Master when they call us that. It's so funny. Now, I do get pissed off and will push back, but that's only because I'm sick of the hypocrisy and double standard. I like to show how they can dish it out but can't take it. However, bottom line, underneath it all, I really don't care what they call me.

0
3

[–] Plavonica 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Then it dawned on me, we don't care because we know innately that we're superior.

The phenomena gets obliquely referenced here.

0
2

[–] natural-disaster 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They get angry because deep down they know it is true.

0
2

[–] MrPim 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Call me a bigot. Call me a cracker. Call me a racist. ...it doesn't matter. You know why? Because I can call you a nigger and you will cry

We need to set this to music for the FNGT

0
2

[–] buckhorn 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The slide isn't necessarily wrong in how it's defining bigotry. The problem is the implication that bigotry is necessarily bad, even when it's just a rational summary of the evidence.

Actually, I take that back. The real definition of bigotry requires some kind of value judgment. If you say men tend to prefer blue and women tend to prefer pink, that's not bigotry unless you add something like, "therefore women are more valuable". The problem with this slide is that some value judgements are less debatable than others. E.g., I prefer to live among people who are less likely to murder me and take my shoes. I guess that makes me a bigot πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

0
1

[–] VitaloStarbucky 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

lol

0
28

[–] FattestConsequence 0 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago 

The party in control of teaching our children has no business teaching anyone anything at all.

0
9

[–] favoritecoloriswhite 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Kikes are in control of the education system, not some "party".

0
2

[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They do call the shots for both.

0
0

[–] SearchVoatBot ago 

This comment was linked from this anonymous v/ScienceAnon comment.

Posted automatically (#119102) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@FattestConsequence: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)

0
22

[–] con77 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

So IQ, work ethic, culture, mean nothing?

0
20

[–] malkoman 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

It means bigotry according to them. IQ is bigotry.

0
2

[–] ilovejuices3 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Unless you're Jewish. Then IQ explains why they're rich, and in control of everything. Nothing to do with religion or culture.

0
4

[–] fartyshorts 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Those are raycis terms

0
3

[–] con77 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

idiocracy in effect

1
19

[–] GenderPronoun 1 point 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

Claire (((Lehmann))).

1
10

[–] 78616BC93459 1 point 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

I don't think she's promoting it, but calling it out.

5
-5

0
3

[–] Atkho 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I'm on your side goyim. Buy my book πŸ‘‹^πŸ‘ƒ^πŸ‘‚

0
0

[–] paybythepound ago  (edited ago)

NF you beat me to it lol

ETA: Every. Fucking. Time

1
-1

[–] A_Punkass_Bitch 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

well it is good she leaked this slide

0
13

[–] irelandLost 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

The definition of bigotry is intolerance of the beliefs or opinions of others. Reaching conclusions about outcome differences of different demographic subgroups is therefore not, by definition, bigotry. (It annoys me how misused the word bigot is. The one opportunity they had to use it correctly, intolerance of Muslims, they wrongly declared it a form of racism)

0
14

[–] Trash_Panda 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I thought it was hilarious that whoever made this attached an asterisk because they're fully aware they are lying.

"By definition it's bigotry* "

*Here's my made up definition of bigotry

0
5

[–] irelandLost 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Ha I hadn’t even noticed that. Any time I hear any of those words these days all is hear is β€œheretic” though, so I might need to add an asterisk were I to make a slide too.

0
4

[–] Literally-Oppressed 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

People really don't understand what bigotry means. All leftists are massive bigots.

0
1

[–] albeit 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Off the top of my head, it is: Unwillingness to tolerate other perspectives, especially an unwillingness to reconsider one's beliefs despite evidence.

The slide is itself an example of bigotry.

I think it's likely that online dictionaries are gradually changing their definitions. Here's one that apparently hasn't been tampered with:

the fact of having and expressing strong, unreasonable beliefs and disliking other people who have different beliefs or a different way of life

0
0

[–] peacegnome ago 

this just changed almost every conversation in my future.

0
8

[–] superspathi 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

These are religious fanatics.

0
2

[–] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yep. Puritanism is back, baby!

load more comments ▼ (39 remaining)