You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
They already wanted to rename Austin, TX because Stephen F. Austin owned slaves. This wouldn't be trolling them at all because they'd be on board with this already.
[–]PewterKey0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
This isn't something they would oppose philosophically. It's something they'd oppose practically because it would directly harm them. It's a divide and conquer gambit. Everything named after New York would be ideologically tainted, but the established names would be too valuable to toss.
So almost all the left would be pushing to change it, while the people invested into the name would try to pump the breaks. It's the kind of brand damage that a company would buy a established smaller brand to rebrand itself with.
There's so so many things named for Stephen F Austin ("the father of Texas").... The big city obviously but also other small towns, countless public schools, two colleges, streets, etc. It would be hugely expensive for the entire state so really hope that doesn't pick up traction
It’s time for everyone to cut up the credit cards and find a different way to destroy the Jewish banking system.
Add to take away the residency of the Muslim first because everyone of them is a Taki a liar back stabber literally and also get rid of the the Nager’s all of them jew Muslim and Knigge are invaders!!!
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Granite_Pill 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
They already wanted to rename Austin, TX because Stephen F. Austin owned slaves. This wouldn't be trolling them at all because they'd be on board with this already.
[–] yt4cz9 [S] 1 point 11 points 12 points (+12|-1) ago
They won't want to do it b/c New York is full of kikes. Their established names the goyim know all start with New York. It's fucking great.
[–] PewterKey 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This isn't something they would oppose philosophically. It's something they'd oppose practically because it would directly harm them. It's a divide and conquer gambit. Everything named after New York would be ideologically tainted, but the established names would be too valuable to toss.
So almost all the left would be pushing to change it, while the people invested into the name would try to pump the breaks. It's the kind of brand damage that a company would buy a established smaller brand to rebrand itself with.
[–] Jiggggg 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There's so so many things named for Stephen F Austin ("the father of Texas").... The big city obviously but also other small towns, countless public schools, two colleges, streets, etc. It would be hugely expensive for the entire state so really hope that doesn't pick up traction
[–] minx88 ago
It’s time for everyone to cut up the credit cards and find a different way to destroy the Jewish banking system.
Add to take away the residency of the Muslim first because everyone of them is a Taki a liar back stabber literally and also get rid of the the Nager’s all of them jew Muslim and Knigge are invaders!!!