You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Seems like if it was a decentralized platform that 30K a month is pretty high for server costs.
Seems like if they were a decentralized platform that much of the heavy lifting would be performed by individuals donating their storage space and networking.
Seems like BitChute pretends to be a decentralized network but serves all of their content from two server spaces.
BitChute has already existed for too long on the promise of decentralization, but hasn't followed through. Within the last six months I discovered a service called LBRY that is actually decentralized. I suggest people take this opportunity to find other services and move on from the fallacy that is BitChute. Not out of anger or protest, but because it's just trading one weak point in communication for another singular weak point.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] JJNova 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Seems like if it was a decentralized platform that 30K a month is pretty high for server costs.
Seems like if they were a decentralized platform that much of the heavy lifting would be performed by individuals donating their storage space and networking.
Seems like BitChute pretends to be a decentralized network but serves all of their content from two server spaces.
BitChute has already existed for too long on the promise of decentralization, but hasn't followed through. Within the last six months I discovered a service called LBRY that is actually decentralized. I suggest people take this opportunity to find other services and move on from the fallacy that is BitChute. Not out of anger or protest, but because it's just trading one weak point in communication for another singular weak point.