You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] PeaceSeeker 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

From Matt Nelson:

Skeptics are wrong when they assert that miracles claimed by other world religions nullify the authenticity of Christian miracles. This is a hasty and unreasonable conclusion. Miracle claims exist outside of Christianity, and these claims emphasize the need for careful examination of each claim. Thus, miracle reports should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and should include consideration of their theological, philosophical, and historical merits.

Believers in Jesus Christ can be at ease, since many Christian miracles—including that foundational supernatural event of Christ’s resurrection—pass the tests with more ease than those of other world religions. At the same time, they should remember that God may have good reasons for working in the lives of non-Christians. All in all, the case for Christianity remains unshaken, firmly bolstered by its rich history of miracles by and through Jesus Christ. If the miracle is authentic, we should rejoice—God never makes mistakes and always acts toward the true good of mankind according to his will.

Regarding non-Christian religion, the fathers of Vatican II tell us, “The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions” (Nostra Aetate, 2). 

The tests being conceptual basis, alternate cause (is it actually miraculous), historicity, and divine purpose. Remember a miracle must be something beyond the powers of created nature. This can apply to the event itself or the cause. Curing a fever or a storm calming are natural events - but when they occur at direct command, they are miraculous, since such things are not a part of created nature.

Conceptual basis applies to whether miracles are expected or predicted by those claiming to have performed them. Buddha condemned miracles as a power distracting from enlightenment, and the Qur'an says God is capable of miracles to serve as signs but that Muhammad is a prophet sent without a sign (lmao) - so we would not expect to take claims about Buddha or Muhammad performing miracles seriously, and at least in the case of Muhammad, there aren't many such claims anyway, and none possess good historicity.

@chirogonemd