Archived Everyone dislikes modernist architecture (currentaffairs.org)
submitted ago by Diogenes_The_Cynic
Posted by: Diogenes_The_Cynic
Posting time: 8 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/23/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 445
SCP: 131
133 upvotes, 2 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
Archived Everyone dislikes modernist architecture (currentaffairs.org)
submitted ago by Diogenes_The_Cynic
view the rest of the comments →
[–] zxcvbnasdf ago
I believe that God segregates differences, not nature :) So not a contradiction, just the difference in terminology.
10000000% agree. Absolutely true.
Agree 10000000%
I agree with you completely. The Church agrees with you completely. The Church is against homosexuality as doctrine. It has been infiltrated by the same people who push the nonsense on our towns. On our cities. On our countries. On all of us. I agree wholeheartedly we must reclaim this entire idea for the Good. To reaffirm that procreation is an incredible positive thing that humans should be striving for. To condemn lust as destructive and evil, as a passion that will wilt and leave one barren and desolate.
We agree completely on this.
Agree. There are people who deserve authority and use it for good, and those who don't deserve authority who use it for evil. That idea is understood fully when one realizes that everyone in the group, from the lowest to the highest, is beholden to God. Is beholden to His standard. Is beholden to love Him as He deserves. When everyone is oriented towards God, everyone is on the same path. When everyone is on the same path, there is no problem.
Think of it like a road. If everyone on the road is driving in different directions, then there is chaos. People must move slowly and carefully, or risk hurting themselves or others. If one does not have a powerful enough vehicle, then they have no way to get themselves where they want to go, potentially even stuck in place! But when everyone is moving in the same direction, people can go incredibly quickly. Highways exist where people can travel hundreds of miles an hour together. All because they're oriented towards the same goal. All because they have the same mission.
We should seek to build that highway for humanity, and get us off the chaotic road we have. The only way I see is through Jesus.
Nature isn't segregating the differences, human consciousness is. Human consciousness which I believe is a gift from God. A gift that you can use in many remarkable ways. Truly beautiful.
Humans are very young. We are still learning. We started with very basic 10 commandments, and even then humans couldn't follow them! And I don't mean after a time, I mean almost instantly, as God was giving humans the laws, literally speaking to them, humans did not care. Not at all.
However in spite of this, God did give commands on how animals should be treated. He did tell us to treat them with respect, and showed us how. But he did it as you show a child to treat animals. As we have grown, we have grown in our understanding of how we should exist with relation to nature as a whole. How we should not only treat animals with respect, but also plants and micro organisms and everything that entails. That's why I'm so interested in regenerative agriculture. That's why I'm so interested in buying a homestead with acreage and living in harmony with the land that God gave us. To try to make the earth a little bit better in the area I have under my control. So that I can be a force bringing about God's will on earth.
There's nothing shameful about being an animal. Humans are animals too. I don't see the negative stigma on the term that you do, because I love animals as God commanded me. I don't treat animals perfectly, human or not, but I'm trying. I hope through the grace of God that I can overcome sin and live as He wills.
I don't think judgements should be biased. I think judgements should be biased towards the just.
I don't think we'd have to if the earth was perfect. I don't think the concept will make sense in Heaven.
Simple and complex is a matter of perspective. It's a matter of what you know. I agree we can only really understand complex things in relation to simple things, as a general rule.
Who holds them static?
I want nothing to do with them, as I made clear before. I'm making a more general point. You say opposites must exist. If opposites must exist, then I want the ability to be free. In order to have the ability to be free, there must be the ability to be a slave. I want both abilities. I want the ability to be a slave to those who would teach me that which I need to know, so I can be more free. There is no contradiction here, in my mind.
Likewise.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago (edited ago)
Because it's compartmentalization of individual existence to the point where the umbrella term (animals; humans) is being used as a justification to negate the individual existence, which acts as an excuse for nothing but negative consequences. When you say animal you already diminish all the different life-forms, when yous say cattle you diminish all the differences in that type of species, and when you say cow you ignore that each and every individual member is is own different existence. Now add ungulates, bovine, commodities, prime beef, price tags etc. to see how humans take something simple from nature, then compartmentalize is to an absurdly complex extant, to then slap an umbrella term on it to hide all the shit they did, while also burying the reality of nature deep under a Chinese Whispers game of worshiping the false authority of brands (idols) based on the beliefs they're holding. And then you're wondering while a criminal opportunist puts on a white lab-coat and proclaims "this is a bovine; I'm a scientist; accept my authority and buy my books". Meanwhile; hopefully undisturbed from all this human insanity, a bunch of so called cows are enjoining their day, while eating grass and adapting to whatever happens next in accordance with the laws of nature.
And that's why you are so easily controlled by contradictions, because you cannot comprehend that "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other". You are being deceived to follow an us vs them division doctrine, that only allows you to accept one side over the other. You don't comprehend that the other side defines your side. You are fooled to sit in a stadium while cheering for your blue team over the red team, without realizing that both teams are owned by the same parasites. The conflict between them is in your head; sold to you by the parasites. There is no team red vs team blue and there is no order vs chaos. Both are one team; they are the ALL; the sum of all things creating the positive and negative circumstances that you have the responsibility to deal with. What the parasites are doing is making a false idol for you to shirk that responsibility to, which is the beliefs you're holding in your head; the belief of conflict; of division of unity (the ALL) in favor of the ONE (your belief), which is your selfish shirking of responsibility.
It makes sense in reality, because this system isn't perfect. You're holding to an assumption over provable reality. You act in contradiction to reality. You are a victim of talmudic reasoning; you're using it without comprehending that you do. Question it for yourself; try to disprove it in reality.
You cannot know anything in a system that is changing other than the rules that define it. Perspective is assumption of change, which by definition will change, so it is by definition not a truth.
Change does, because change is defined as the movement between a beginning an end. If you start a race you already defined that it will have an end. The length (time) doesn't matter. It will end, because you created a beginning. Opposites MUST coexist, because they're defined by each other. this is a fundamental truth. It cannot be changed. What can be changed is our comprehension of it, hence the deception of "duality" creating opportunities for rhetorical weapons like "love" and "hate". See, I can say that I love vanilla ice-cream and you can say that you hate vanilla ice-cream and yet they're not defined by each other at all, but we both can now believe that we are saying the truth, which will create conflict, which is what the parasites are leeching upon. That's how we are controlled. We are being deceived to believe,controlled through contradiction of belief, and harvested for the energy of the conflict that is causing.
NO, COEXIST. As in unity.
You already have. You have total freedom of choice, but it is defined as a liberty gifted through your slavery to the laws of nature. You're a slave that has the liberty to experience total freedom of choice. You believe freedom to mean that you are in control over everything, but as you see in the so called jews; their control over us makes them enslaved to us. Their entire existence is defined by keeping us under control. I that the freedom you want?
I mentioned that before. This is purely based on yourself restricting your comprehension with belief. In this case you believe in the authority of the teacher; thereby enslaving yourself to that idol of authority. Without that belief in authority you just learn from one another and that's that. You now struggle to understand that, because the parasites have created layers upon layers of deceptions around authorities like all the licensing, the status symbols, the worshiping rituals, the chain of command system, the party line corruption and so on. You don't comprehend that only you have authority over yourself. It was the usage of deities that robbed that from you by making you give your own authority to the ONE (which actually is your own selfishness of shirking responsibility), which is why you know give authority to everyone and everything, because you don't comprehend your own authority anymore; it's restricted within your consciousness by the belief in the unquestionable authority. There is also your contradiction...you believe in the authority to the ONE, while in reality you give authority to the ALL.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
There is a crucial difference, because one requires that prerequisite contract of belief, while the other is a term describing the physical and mental reality, based on adaption. So when I say nature did this; I grab a handful of it and show it to you in the physical sou that you can comprehend it in the mental. I don't have to say nature; it's not necessary; just complimentary when talking about the sum of all things. Nobody has to believe that there is a whole to the individual aspects in front of them. God on the other hand demands the contract of belief, demands to be proclaimed upon everything, and demands to take center position of authority over everything; yet not such demands can ever be mentally perceived or physically proven by those who don't agree to the contract of belief, which are the vast majority of life-forms within this ecosystem. For all of them, those that believe, contradict logic, reason and common sense. Nobody feels that way about saying nature. That being said; I also only use the term nature because language is restricting me in communicating. If I teach children how to make soil, train martial arts, collect eggs etc. then nature is implied; subconsciously perceived as binding us to this system. There is no such thing that isn't nature within this ecosystem, so a child automatically perceives what is without branding it. A brand (an idol) automatically creates the opposite, so then the child has to comprehend that when I proclaim something to be nature, that something else might not be nature. I just implemented a contradiction into the comprehension of reality of the child.
Start with reclaiming the date of the inception of your life over birth. These are nine months of existence that are being stolen from us. This also has something to do with different frequencies at different dates for different life-forms. So the nine month shift pushed our frequency balance out of order. This is one of the many topics I would like to look more deeply into...If I ever find the time that is.
Again falling for division by using one side (positive) to go against the other (negative). Procreation and lust are defined by each other. The act of procreation will always invoke the temptation of lust, because you lose control over your emotions while doing it. Your condemnation won't cut it. This is like always about our responsibility of balance in between. Every time you engage physically with each other outside the intent of procreation (of creating new life) you are operating under the intent of selfish lust, and that will happen no matter what. It doesn't help to be judgemental about the act; neither before (fear and shame propaganda) nor after (excuse and justification). What needs to be taught is responsibility to control intent during our actions, which is adaption and which is restricted by...holding beliefs. You believe to do positive by condemning negative, but the act of believing is what prevents you from actually adapting. So during the physical act your mind will restrict itself to the comprehension according to the belief, while your body participates in the act subconsciously. Mind and body are not working in unity; they are contradicting each other, because you don't comprehend reality; you don't adapt to it.
Wrong. Deserve means "to serve" and in combination with authority you create an idol out of it. You do this mentally while create a belief that contradicts the physical reality. The alpha doesn't need authority; he just is and you adapt to it. Just like with nature as a whole; you are at liberty to use it, but have no right to claim (proclaim) it, because that would be selfish and creates division and conflict. Don't brand the alpha...adapt to him; follow him; test him; and drop him once he isn't useful anymore. No belief required; no idols (brands) required and no cults of worship required. Also, while you adapt to the alpha, every actions any of you undertake are still about balancing between positive and negative consequences. Following a temporary authority (without proclaiming it) does not give you the right to shirk responsibility for your own actions whatsoever. You will always be the ONE authority over your own actions.
There is no other path than towards death; the end. Change is a one way street from a beginning towards an end.
Everyone is on the same path and all the problems come from the consequences of our individual actions, which will always be positive and negative. The path is movement; our lives are the struggle of balance.
This is completely wrong. You're promoting herd mentality by destroying differences; that's the agenda behind communism. Your highway analogy is literally the party-line. The entire traffic grid situation is not about efficiency; it's about psychological cattle farming and it's based on the nomads building clusters to destroy the rooted. Stop and go is about psychologically attacking the human comprehension of adaptation in the change of nature, by making us loath it. The stress is designed to be harvested as energy and it creates the dependency in the hope for it all to "just flow". They train mankind with traffic to accept the party line; to accept the authority of the system of control; to believe that efficiency is out of their hands. To believe in the ONE, which represents their own selfish shirking of responsibilities. That is also the reason why the masons control all major world wide sports competitions. They herd humans into clusters to harvest their emotional energy, while their perceived unity of "fandom" is nothing but the selfish shirking of responsibility by letting others compete (adaptation) for them, and of course they use idols to sell all this, just like they do with religions.
Nature is the sum of all things within this ecosystem; human consciousness is the ability for the individual part to perceive the whole. The whole creates the individual; the individual reacts to the whole. Segregation is the whole presenting information to the individual so that their senses can learn from it. This is how the whole sustains itself by supplying incentives to the individual participants to motivate them to help sustain the whole.
What you're describing is adaptation to ever changing circumstances; it's the ongoing struggle to maintain the natural order. Once you have your farmstead you will notice how the nature of everything is teaching you responsibility through demand and supply. It is all encompassing and will define your life as a guardian of order that is constantly struggling to direct the flow of nature (the change) into the most productive way, while also teaching you the balance through the spoilage of the overproduce. Life and death, circle of life, chaos and order, TIME, responsibility etc. You will comprehend all of this from the maintenance of your own land; which also teaches you the self sustenance of a self sustaining ecosystem and how your actions create consequences in it. None of this requires you to believe anything. Your rituals of praying, of restricting your comprehension through meditation, your idol worshiping of mental authority etc. All of these represents a selfish waste of time within your farmstead. All the life around you will continue to demand and supply, while you take a selfish trip down mental lane to feel better about yourself. Why? What are you missing in the reality? Are you not surrounded by purpose, responsibilities, benefits, endless possibilities, inspirations, hardships, loss, temptations...everything? Why not just let your comprehension keep spinning in adaptation. Why do you fall for the want (a temptation) of holding a belief, when it's isn't a need whatsoever?