Archived Everyone dislikes modernist architecture (currentaffairs.org)
submitted ago by Diogenes_The_Cynic
Posted by: Diogenes_The_Cynic
Posting time: 8 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/23/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 445
SCP: 131
133 upvotes, 2 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
Archived Everyone dislikes modernist architecture (currentaffairs.org)
submitted ago by Diogenes_The_Cynic
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
The sum of all things (nature) shows us everything we perceive through our senses and instincts by sustaining this whole system. It segregates differences so that we can detect and learn from them. Understand that you're trying to play a game of rhetoric here, when you substitute Nature and God with each other. They slapped the ONE (the creator) onto everything, despite us being able to prove that all individual existence is tied to the ALL. As a believer you can only point your finger at something and proclaim that God did it, which is the psychological tool of utilizing blind faith in false authority to shirk your own responsibility. They don't want us to comprehend that we have responsibilities within this ecosystem, and they deceive us towards the hedonistic ONE, which represents our own selfishness, to attack the all, which is the unity that protects us, that is the prerequisite for all creation.
We all accept the contract of responsibility to this ecosystem the first time we take a breath, which is us agreeing to the struggle for life over death. This is the first natural law (opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other) defining the next one: "all actions have consequences", because in between two barriers (a beginning; life and an end; death) every action made will have a consequences towards one of those sides. Now, since life is always running out and death unavoidable (always luring with deadly temptations) we require that very contract I mentioned for the 3rd fundamental natural law, which is "morality". Nature forcing us to agree with life over death designates value to life over death, which means we now have a positive and a negative outcome to the consequences of all our actions, which creates the demand to uphold the balance in between (the natural order). These are the fundamental laws of nature for all existence. A stone has a beginning and an end, and all our actions can have a positive or negative consequence for the stone, which means that these laws effect all existence; conscious life or immovable objects, since we all share a core form of energy.
Now here you can argue that nature forces the value of life over dead, because our instincts (received from nature) overrule our consciousness, which would negate freedom of choice, BUT the breathing aspect is tied to birth; not inception. At inception there's a struggle between the seeds and the egg, and where there's struggle, there's choice. Now I cannot pinpoint the choice a seed makes (yet?), but I can apply the concept taking from our freedom of choice in life to see that there are no contradictions when you apply it to inception. What I do know and can prove endlessly through adaptation are the laws of nature, which for this case states that freedom of choice is defined as a liberty offered by bondage. They are correct when they say; freedom is slavery, because those are defined by each other.
I can explain each and every individual action, while using the term "nature" to tie it to the sum of all things (the All), while you diminish every individual action by slapping the term "God" on it (the ONE), without having any proof, while demanding unquestionable belief from everyone. I make anyone comprehend everything (at least I try) and no belief is required in any way, shape or form. All the contradiction I run into while using adaptation are towards human beliefs, which is by design to control us; to divide us (compartmentalization, which you promote), to destroy our unity; to make us selfish.
It's you lack of comprehension fooling you here. You already talked about the math behind nature so there is the origin of your numbers, the abstract shapes require your mind to shape them out of regular shapes, your ideas are the based on the inspirations the outside is invoking within you, the concepts are you playing with possibilities and eventualities out of that which nature shows you, and all information originates from nature. Saying the a UFO is unnatural is your lack of comprehension, because a flying object requires you to comprehend flying first, the abstract shape of it requires you to comprehend the regular shapes first, same for speed, lighting, vibration, motion, frequency etc. You cannot create without the sum of all thing making it possible for you. When you say that you can make things that are unnatural, you claim to create out of nothing. See were this is going? It's the human lie of 0, when it's just the lesser of 1. I urge you to study transhumanism, which aims to replace the 1 (the natural reality) with the 0 (the digital fantasy), which has been going on forever and all technology was systematically rolled out to implement total control of the human comprehension. Again; I don't believe this and neither should you, but use adaptation to try to disprove it for yourself (which I couldn't so far), because it's active all around and continuously growing stronger.
You require two things to operate within a system based on constant change. 1. The unchangeable laws that define the changing system (the laws of nature) and a tool that allows you to utilize constant adaptation (our consciousness). With those in place you can adapt to ever changing circumstances (change) by building your assumptions (lies) on a foundation of truth (the laws of nature). That is the struggle to uphold balance in movement; It's about maintenance of the present; not about chasing any goals, because the only goal is death (the end), which we agree to when we breath to struggle for life. It's not about truth or false; it's about the balance in between. The reason you want one side over the other is because of selfishness, is because you want to claim ownership of something; you want to achieve something. What you don't realize is that life is the ultimate price of existence that was gifted to us, which defines the value of everything. Without existence nothing holds any value, and you were even gifted the ability to gift it along to your offspring. What more can you possible WANT, before you realize what you actually NEED?
No. That isn't about religion, it's about selling you the false authority (deity) as the prerequisite for the religious doctrine. They used the relationship from a child to his father to get the believer to shirk his own responsibility towards an authority figure, which they then declared unquestionable in the doctrine which followed, after that they could slap the authority on anything, because you already accepted it from the get go. The reason that worked is because they changed one crucial aspect of the relationship in their deception; TIME; change. The authority of the father ends once the childhood end; hence the teacher being defined by nature as always being temporary, and the responsibility for oneself being defined by the end of childhood. They deceived you to accept a teacher that is eternal, unquestionable and that takes all responsibility from you. Hence the believer becoming selfish to the point of rejecting any responsibility to the present reality, in exchange for the belief in a substitute for death (afterlife, heaven, paradise, spirituality, enlightenment etc.)
You talk about the betterment of the child, but you don't realize that you're the child and that you deceive yourself to not let go of a false father, based on a deception coming from a party you don't even notice. You are being preyed upon through psychological manipulation to not comprehend reality fully (thanks to the beliefs they dump on us).
First; good and evil are also not natural states. Let's ignore those. In the case of the father the authority is not unquestionable, but defined by circumstances like the connection of the bloodline and the paternal instinct. As a father you may have noticed that one characteristic of being a child is to rebel against the authority of the parents, hence the authority figure and the teaching aspect from childhood to adulthood. And as I stated above; he eventually will have to face the reality of the dangers a street holds. A beginning is defined by something ending, so authority over childhood ending is fundamental.
I'm not gonna bite. I live martial arts my entire life and know the ins and outs of manipulating my consciousness through mediation (which I do in motion) to create whatever feedback I want. Stop being selfish and get out of your own head to face reality. Thank you very much.