You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]heygeorge[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
It’s as if you took garbage Jim Hoft’s garbage word for it and didn’t read the document itself. (This is a classic gateway pundit shit move.)
I guarantee you did not read the document being used to sensationalize this.
On the first page, it describes and compares the effort to the importance of tracking the morbidity of influenza.
Here is what could be considered the most damaging part, but this truly is only if taken completely out of context to the entirety of the guidance document.
In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances, certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a COVID–19 infection was likely. However, please note that testing for COVID–19 should be conducted whenever possible.
That is it. They even make sure you would crib the result as “probable” or “presumed” assumedly so that figure can also be studied and compiled.
Yesterday I read that New York City was only counting hospital diagnosed deaths as c19. They brought up the additional 200 deaths that occurred at home (which alone is 15+% above the average of ALL people who would typically perish in NYC/day).
So, consider engaging your brain. If 167 people, on average, die in NYC every day, yet 550+ people died in NYC yesterday... Is not something amiss?
[–]heygeorge[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
This chart shows that it was a mild pneumonia season. I assume that has to do with the incredibly mild winter in the country. Then the rapid fall off also demonstrates a typical pattern. By week 11, (incidentally, that would equate to March 11), there were not more than a handful of COVID-19 deaths in the US. So there is not even a correlation in this chart.
the covid test is for exosome rna which is present in anyone with respiratory distress
I was not aware of this, and it is inconsistent with what i have read. If you had some evidence to support this, I would be all eyes and ears. Right now I'm seeing a lot of hat and no cattle.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] heygeorge [S] ago
It’s as if you took garbage Jim Hoft’s garbage word for it and didn’t read the document itself. (This is a classic gateway pundit shit move.)
I guarantee you did not read the document being used to sensationalize this.
On the first page, it describes and compares the effort to the importance of tracking the morbidity of influenza.
Here is what could be considered the most damaging part, but this truly is only if taken completely out of context to the entirety of the guidance document.
That is it. They even make sure you would crib the result as “probable” or “presumed” assumedly so that figure can also be studied and compiled.
Yesterday I read that New York City was only counting hospital diagnosed deaths as c19. They brought up the additional 200 deaths that occurred at home (which alone is 15+% above the average of ALL people who would typically perish in NYC/day).
So, consider engaging your brain. If 167 people, on average, die in NYC every day, yet 550+ people died in NYC yesterday... Is not something amiss?
[–] 23318501? ago (edited ago)
Can you engage with how they're moving deaths around:
https://files.catbox.moe/v1vkio.jpeg
If you knew more, you'd know that the covid test is for exosome rna which is present in anyone with respiratory distress.
So they aren't testing for a virus at all, but anything that causes lung issues, including flu, air pollution or general physical stress.
[–] heygeorge [S] ago
This chart shows that it was a mild pneumonia season. I assume that has to do with the incredibly mild winter in the country. Then the rapid fall off also demonstrates a typical pattern. By week 11, (incidentally, that would equate to March 11), there were not more than a handful of COVID-19 deaths in the US. So there is not even a correlation in this chart.
I was not aware of this, and it is inconsistent with what i have read. If you had some evidence to support this, I would be all eyes and ears. Right now I'm seeing a lot of hat and no cattle.