You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]Trash_Panda[S]0 points
4 points
4 points
(+4|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Sorry but the liberalism of today is the logical conclusion of the liberalism you advocated for yesterday, because you are advocating for, quite literally, no moral framework at all. Today's liberals are just carrying this torch of "radical freedom", which means that any type of moral standards at all are considered oppressive. Any rules are seen as oppressive. That includes not only morality but cops, borders, theft, drugs, everything. That's what "hate speech" ultimately is, someone trying to express their moral disposition to others.
You are seeing the blooming fruits from post-enlightenment revolutionary thought. So yes, you are a fascist, because you are part of the old transitional model that needs to be done away with. You are an amalgamation of the old world and the new, a stepping stone from A to B, and your services are no longer required. Thanks for playing
Old school liberalism opposed any moral framework which advocated for victimless crime being a legitimate concept, and I'll stand by that until the day I die (which is precisely why I disagree with a lot - not all, but a lot - of what Goats tend to advocate) but that included the idea that all speech should be free from restriction. I've never opposed anyone expressing a moral disposition, I've merely always opposed anyone attempting to enforce it on someone who didn't personally agree with it. From a free speech standpoint, that obviously means that if one opposes freedom of speech, they are themselves the problem.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Trash_Panda [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Sorry but the liberalism of today is the logical conclusion of the liberalism you advocated for yesterday, because you are advocating for, quite literally, no moral framework at all. Today's liberals are just carrying this torch of "radical freedom", which means that any type of moral standards at all are considered oppressive. Any rules are seen as oppressive. That includes not only morality but cops, borders, theft, drugs, everything. That's what "hate speech" ultimately is, someone trying to express their moral disposition to others.
You are seeing the blooming fruits from post-enlightenment revolutionary thought. So yes, you are a fascist, because you are part of the old transitional model that needs to be done away with. You are an amalgamation of the old world and the new, a stepping stone from A to B, and your services are no longer required. Thanks for playing
[–] sonofaboomer 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Lenin called those people "useful idiots". Was he wrong?
[–] hatrickpatrick ago
Old school liberalism opposed any moral framework which advocated for victimless crime being a legitimate concept, and I'll stand by that until the day I die (which is precisely why I disagree with a lot - not all, but a lot - of what Goats tend to advocate) but that included the idea that all speech should be free from restriction. I've never opposed anyone expressing a moral disposition, I've merely always opposed anyone attempting to enforce it on someone who didn't personally agree with it. From a free speech standpoint, that obviously means that if one opposes freedom of speech, they are themselves the problem.