You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
13

[–] tury 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Although I get your point, there is some sort of relevance (although not shown in graphic).

If this small amount of jet fuel were as potent as described - why would the USA military use ANYTHING OTHER than jet fuel for it's bombing runs? The amount of damage caused by so called jet-fuel would outperform the most expensive missiles and bombs that the world has ever produced (with a couple of extremely expensive and potent exceptions).

If the jet-fuel is THAT efficient, to destroy so many buildings - even ones not touched by the jet fuel - this would save billions of dollars for the military in the span of a single year.

The point is that - obviously - the jet fuel is a lie.