Archived What they're teaching our children in history class (uploads.disquscdn.com)
submitted ago by dan_east
Posted by: dan_east
Posting time: 10 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/21/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1377
SCP: 216
220 upvotes, 4 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
Archived What they're teaching our children in history class (uploads.disquscdn.com)
submitted ago by dan_east
view the rest of the comments →
[–] GreenSlug 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
But what defines "people" has drastically changed. White men are people. All else is either a lower animal or property. People who are not white men do not have the same rights for a reason, they can not be trusted with the same level of responsibility as white men. God designed and declared it so
[–] cyclops1771 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That's a way to view it. Personally, the issue isn't Negroes with guns, it's Negroes thinking that they are special. It's the attitude, not the weapon.
[–] GreenSlug 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Its the niggers. And women
[–] beefartist 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Your issue is that you don't see the irony in granting a bunch of people (admittedly on average "better" people) rights because of the colour of their skin. Not all whites deserve rights and the very idea of (((whites))) wasn't really around. All of the people involved were homogeneous not just by pigment but they were all ex-Englishmen or identified as English. If we weren't so mutted up we would still be calling ourselves "Polish" or "German", etc...not white