0
83

[–] Locked_Account 0 points 83 points (+83|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Wake up, it's 1984.

Hatecrime=Thoughtcrime.

0
26

[–] last18500 [S] 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I’m aware. I’m just wondering how we let it get this far. Especially with all the warnings (e.g., 1984, Animal Farm, Brave New World, the Creature From Jekyll Island, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion etc.)

The real question becomes, “How do we fix it?”

If it cannot be fixed then what do we do next?

1
55

[–] SpreeFeech 1 point 55 points (+56|-1) ago 

It's the jew. America's problem has always been the jews and will always be the jews until we exile ALL of them. The truth will undo all the jews power. If the public knew they were lied to and manipulated by vile hateful jews then we can vote our way out of this mess. But like Mark Twain said...

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled

0
21

[–] H3r0n 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Those books don’t even exist in my parents world. They dont read and never have picked up a book my entire childhood. Maybe every other boomer thought the same, “why read books when tv tells you everything faster?”

Thanks

0
8

[–] InyourfaceNancyGrace 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

The way this is skirted is - you can still hate whom/whatever you want to hate. You can even call them whatever name you like (in US - Canada does have laws against wrongspeak). It's just when an actual crime is committed (assault, battery, etc.) that the hate crime card comes in to play.

I still think it's absurd, because if you beat/rob/kill someone, odds are you're not doing it out of love for them. Motivation is irrelevant to the crime - it is only relevant to investigators and the courts. Once the crime has been established, it doesn't matter if the malice was focused or general - crime is crime is crime already before tacking on extra penalties for motivation (or wrongthink).

I don't agree with it, don't like it (for reasons above), but that's how it has happened. It skirts 1A by basically saying once you've committed to being a criminal you're no longer protected by the Bill of Rights, or at least that protection has been significantly compromised.

0
3

[–] Tyrodragon 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Did you know about Birobidzhan?

It is an autonomous Oblast in Russia that was created for Jews under the Soviet regime in 1931. It still exists today.

Why is this important?

It provides insight to the worldwide zeitgeist of the Jewish question during that time. It wasn't only Hitler that discussed this matter. It was the Zionists themselves who consistently advocated it. Stalin and Hitler, the British, along with others, took under Jewish advisory a solution to the Jewish question. The Jewish question was actually driven by Jewish financiers, rabbis, and business leaders. Under Stalin, the Swiss architect Hannes Meyer planned and established Birobidzhan in 1931. It was approved by Stalin and became the administrative center of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in 1934; town status was granted to it in 1937. During this time, Germany in discussions with Zionists offered Uganda and Madagascar as a homeland. They ultimately declined and instead wanted Palestine. This deal was actually approved and Britain was a party to it as well, since Palestine was under their jurisdiction. However, a growing number of Zionists in America and Britain disagreed and were vocal about Jews being sold out. It wasn't until after the German-hating Winston Churchill became PM of Britain that the former deal was completely undone. Germany was left with a massive expatriation mess and large investments in already built processing centers.

0
5

[–] Israel-Did-9-11 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Free speech = Free thought

0
3

[–] FederalShill 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Though we wake up to this, lets not accept it

0
3

[–] Israel-Did-9-11 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

When laws are unjust, good men become outlaws

0
1

[–] ShakklezthaKlown 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

frankly, most of you are retarded beyond usefulness, you deserve the coming destruction.

0
0

[–] Jimmycrackerson ago 

no u

0
28

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago  (edited ago)

As soon as they started building group-level response around the term "terrorism".

From there, they transitioned to "domestic terrorism", i.e. the enemy is no longer outside but is inside the system (triggering group level anxiety and environment scanning).

From there, they changed the category itself, reducing "terror" to "hate" (in theory violent action always follows a more primary cause: hatred).

This little categorical sleight of hand went virtually unnoticed, mostly because it allowed people to ignore a news narrative they'd grown bored with after 20 years and instead drew them toward fun things like blogs and social media (at least *accessible things that you don't have to get your fat ass off the couch for). Their mental immune systems (for the most part) didn't even flinch.

Another way to think of this is that hatred is a conceptual imprint that is easier to work with and propagate through a society because it applies to the very constructs through which we communicate, and to speech itself. That's easier than spreading the concept of terrorism internally, which by definition requires action and not just the conceptual contents. It's more expensive to create a literal war, than to convince you there is a war in your mind and your speech on the internet. So without even noticing, everyone became soldiers in their little proxy wars in virtual spaces online. Although, we do still see false flags regularly that take things from the virtual to the real world when they need something particularly inflammatory. But even this serves to further their purpose. Suddenly the edges of real-world violence and online "violence" in speech start to bleed together and people form false equivalencies between the two - to the extent that many liberals today see almost no meaningful distinction between verbal violence and physical violence. It even appears to me that, often, they respond more acutely to the former than they do the latter - probably because, again, it's lower effort to carry on a virtual crusade than to carry on a crusade of actual physical retribution against your enemy.

Terror became hate, in the span of months. And now it is hateful to even refer to things as terrorism because "hate" underlies all bad in the world. Therefore, stopping hatred becomes the implicit means to pursue zero conflict, world peace, and end to violence.

Nevermind that it's a child's story, there's enough televisions saying it for that to be irrelevant. The God they awoke with the trauma of 9/11 did what orchestrations like Pearl Harbor and the Holocaust did in the last century. That God causes us to congeal and wait for an organismal response from our "brain".

0
8

[–] ketoll 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Very insightful. They seem to always prop up an ambiguous enemy to retain overall control. And it has to always be an unwinnable battle. War on drugs, war on terror, war on hate, etc.

It's actually a fascinating mechanism for controlling a Roman style society when you look at it objectively.

0
9

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Oh, I respect the hell out of it. I made a post not too long ago expressing that we really ought to respect what the Jew represents as an evolutionary strategem, even if only for the sake of understanding the enemy more completely. I should make it clear that I mean respect here in the very narrow sense of respecting why it has been successful so far; I do not respect it in any sense of the moral facts, or in terms of looking at it through the lens of virtue or honor. But that distinction is important, because the virtue and the honor are an intra-cultural truth, not a universal, so I can respect the success of the Jew's evolutionary strategy outside of one cultural system, objectively as just a unit or mode of trying to "make it work" for one's people. It's an insanely sophisticated way of subsisting and hiding from a host society's immune response. I think of it a bit like the Alien series of movies.

On the one hand, I feel like the droid Nash that just has a fascination with the alien/parasite for the sake of science, but then on the other I feel like Ripley: get the flamethrower, we're heading down into the fucking nest and we're going to burn them out and get that little child called our society back. The important thing to keep in mind is Ripley is the one who survives. It's also particularly good as a metaphor because Jewry is such a complete matriarchy. The "infection" passes on from the mother.

0
7

[–] HiJoker 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Sheep to slaughter is what that yields. Nature will always produce predators so their logic is complete Tra La La Land folly. I don't think it's unintentional that the narrative is this stupid.

0
1

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I totally agree.

0
14

[–] version7 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

When they're zog

0
11

[–] UrCoolerOlderBrother 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

They have been normalizing this type of prosecution for years. In places like Canada and Europe they have really cranked up the anti-hate(anti-free speech) bullshit. While they increased prosecution in other countries they increased the media coverage in the US. A lot of times the way headlines would be written, would make them seem as though they occured in the US. They've also started trying to find obscure laws to charge people with when people are caught saying things that aren't PC. This has been a long slow process and it is not over. Kids these days think not hearing "hate speech" is somehow more important than having free speech. They've been brainwashed. It's partly up to us to teach these little pussys how important these rights are and why. Good luck everyone. Stay smart. And never relax.

0
5

[–] AgentSakura 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

They've been brainwashed.

And it's not their fault.

We are on what, the fourth of fifth generation of the pacified and marxist eugenics engineering social experimentation?

Thanks to the internet and the information age we have come to know who our oppressors are "der juden", what they've done to us and why they have systematically butchered us over the last 200 - 2000+ years.

We are now in the organization phase but soon this will all culminate in open warfare yet again.

0
9

[–] peacegnome 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

(((Justice system))).

You will notice that there is one group if people who mostly work in influential fields (law, education, boards, government, administrations)

0
6

[–] jimibulgin 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

media.

0
4

[–] Butterbread 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

banking

0
4

[–] TrialsAndTribulation 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Most of the commenters here are close, but it really goes back to WWI, when people like Colonel House, an advisor to President Wilson, were pushing for the US to enter the war after Wilson's re-election. After the war, propaganda and public relations became the new thing, mostly created by Edward Bernays, who was Sigmund Freud's nephew. It was used to mold public perception and public opinion, to create what Chomsky calls "the manufacture of consent".

This is covered extremely well in Adam Curtis's documentary series "Century of the Self", a must watch for all goats to understand how the elite think and the tools they use.

Modern so-called "hate crimes" are just an extension of public relations flavored with political correctness, and combined with law enforcement to incentivize the public not to engage in illegal thinking.

0
4

[–] Killdozer6gozillian 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

When they legalized propaganda on the public.

0
4

[–] randomfuckingidiot 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Never.

Never kneel. Never apologize. Always attack.

0
1

[–] Intrixina 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Words to live by.

load more comments ▼ (38 remaining)