You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
3

[–] Wazhappenin1 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I think any statement that overly generalizes to include all members of a certain race in a negative light is not true. That's why it's good to remind ourselves not to be extreme it's better to say something like 99% rather than say all. Or the majority of blacks exhibit nigger Behavior rather than call all Blacks niggars. You cannot black wash every racial genotype. The stereotypes are here for a reason no doubt but I've been robbed by both blacks and whites I've been screwed buy black tenants and white tenants. One thing you can say with utmost certainty is that all homosexuals are degenerates. And you can never trust a whore. But calling all Chinese people bug-eaters doesn't do the white superiority movement any good, because anyone with a average IQ can quickly see the flaws in that argument.

0
1

[–] slowcrash101 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is definitely an interesting discussion. Faggotry is not a natural phenomenon there is likely trauma involved at one point during development that leads to faggotry. Stereotypes exist for a reason, and like you say you cannot say everyone will do something or not, and you're correct because reality is not deterministic but probabilistic. x/time = frequency is the most fundamental formula which we use to understand experience.

1:1 would equal truth. However we are too ignorant, our measurement techniques may not capture all the relevant details, etc. So we cannot say in any case our experience is 1:1, but we can make a probabilistic guess and not be far off. Even in a science as rigorous as engineering there is a manufacturing tolerance, we can get closer to but never approach a perfect fit. But you can get so close that it doesn't matter, that you can treat it as truth for all intents and purposes.

That is ok. As long as your stereotypes are based on probabilistic facts then holding such stereotypes can only help you. It's as helpful as saying if you play with fire you're going to get burned. In combustion modeling for instance, we can see a certain behavior in the experimental data, and we can't model that behavior, but we can safely assume due to experiments that that behavior occurs. That behavior is incorporated into the larger model, and it works, it predicts other behaviors and leads to progress, but it's based of something we can't explain at the moment. When we finally investigate this behavior and why it happens, and we use this knowledge to tweak our model, we get wildly inaccurate results which don't sync up with experiments. Meaning our understanding is still off, meanwhile the model based on the assumption is still producing good results. I don't know what this means, other than heuristics aren't necessarily a bad thing even if they're based slightly on ignorance, as long as they align with reality then who cares.

0
1

[–] Wazhappenin1 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There's one thing about homosexuality that is not discussed even amongst the environmentalist because they don't want to offend the homosexuals that is pollution a hormone disruptor chemicals especially chemicals related to The Plastic industry reduce male testosterone to the point where estrogen plays the dominant role or more dominant. I'm sure some homosexuals are born with hormone deficiencies but the vast majority are either chemically altered or have dealt with some degree of sexual trauma that's turned them gay regardless of the origins of homosexuality to say that all homosexuals are degenerate based upon the Norms of society that have been developed over thousands of years is a true statement. And the fact that pedophiles identify more readily with being homosexual than heterosexual is the icing on the cake.

0
1

[–] Wazhappenin1 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Solid. Just like saying red mushrooms are something to be avoided if we are here to the stereotype say of black people we will protect yourselves and be on guard when were in black neighborhoods.

Not every Mexican or black person knocking on your window while at a traffic light is going to stab you but if you adhere to The Stereotype that other races are dangerous you won't roll down the window and give the chance of a stereotype to be proven true. That's protection offered by cliche phrases or stereotypes you play with fire you going to get burned. Or say a white woman who thinks about getting in a relationship with a nigger in the back of her mind if she saying to herself don't do it she will probably have a better life. But today most of us are cut off from our Natural Instincts of survival because Society is such that it tries to beat the odds. Survival is it missing something that's necessarily only appropriate for the wilderness.

When I was traveling I was kidnapped both in Germany and in Morocco but the vast majority of Germans treated us fine vast majority of Americans that we dealt with we're all trying to get something from us. That's why having a balanced view of matters I'm not being extreme is the best way of going about it. There are black Patriots and white traitors

0
0

[–] HuginnOgMuninn [S] ago 

Truth, shitposts like this should never be taken too seriously.

0
0

[–] Wazhappenin1 ago 

its a good question- i used opportunities like thisto balance myperspective