You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
First of all it’s a fixed camera that does not rotate in all directions. I’m talking about an astronaut on a space walk or even a “deep space probe” that has a camera which can actually look in every direction.
It had a panoramic sweep over 90 degrees. As for helmet cams, all spacewalks have those now.
Yet we never see anyone just take a camera and say ok here you can see a bunch of stars, and if I turn it to the left you can see a galaxy, and if I turn it to the right you can see the sun, and if I turn it beneath me we can see a nebula, and if I look straight up we can see another galaxy, and if I look behind me you can see this planet
Stars and nebulas are too weak to see when the sun is out. I showed you video of the sun and a planet at the same time, but you didn't like it.
it’s been 50 years and we still don’t have any video of any planets, stars, nebulae, etc
You mean aside from all the ones we do have, that you dislike?
[–]blackguard19[S]0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
So Voyager 1, which is said to be 13 billion miles from earth, can’t show stars or nebulae, or videos of its supposed flybys of planets, because the “sun is out?” How exactly is the sun “out” when you’re not even orbiting the sun? And why don’t they just adjust exposure settings to show these celestial bodies when the sun is not “out?”
Way to waste your time formatting a typical shill quote-mining response in a dead thread. Im only responding so the stray latecomer will see how retarded the shills are. Pointing out the typical wall of text quote-mined response, the “let me answer your question with a question” replies, and the way you still dodge the question about the fake-ass Apollo moon landings. Saying that a 90 degree turn of a camera is comparable to rotating the camera freely in every direction..... you’re really dumb kid. You need to ask for help with your script.
You just said “all the ones we do have,” meaning that there are videos of stars, planets, and nebulae, when there is literally not a single one. You think people are dumb enough to just swallow low-effort lies like that, I guess.
You won’t debate me in a public thread because you’re an inept embarrassment. Just keep wasting your effort in a dead thread that no one will see.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago
It had a panoramic sweep over 90 degrees. As for helmet cams, all spacewalks have those now.
Stars and nebulas are too weak to see when the sun is out. I showed you video of the sun and a planet at the same time, but you didn't like it.
You mean aside from all the ones we do have, that you dislike?
What're you basing that on?
[–] blackguard19 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
So Voyager 1, which is said to be 13 billion miles from earth, can’t show stars or nebulae, or videos of its supposed flybys of planets, because the “sun is out?” How exactly is the sun “out” when you’re not even orbiting the sun? And why don’t they just adjust exposure settings to show these celestial bodies when the sun is not “out?”
Way to waste your time formatting a typical shill quote-mining response in a dead thread. Im only responding so the stray latecomer will see how retarded the shills are. Pointing out the typical wall of text quote-mined response, the “let me answer your question with a question” replies, and the way you still dodge the question about the fake-ass Apollo moon landings. Saying that a 90 degree turn of a camera is comparable to rotating the camera freely in every direction..... you’re really dumb kid. You need to ask for help with your script.
You just said “all the ones we do have,” meaning that there are videos of stars, planets, and nebulae, when there is literally not a single one. You think people are dumb enough to just swallow low-effort lies like that, I guess.
You won’t debate me in a public thread because you’re an inept embarrassment. Just keep wasting your effort in a dead thread that no one will see.
[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago
Sure, here's a picture from Voyager showing some of the planets.
Because it would let in so much light bouncing off the earth it'd be pure white.