You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
I know right.. Something always felt off to me after I noticed years ago the (((history))) documentaries and paid msm talking heads always propagating the 'failed artist...' trope while never showing any artworks, as if the statement was proof in itself and didn't need any corroborating evidence .... Then some ytube channel i stumbled on had a whole show about his artworks. Suffice to say even now, People will hear and repeat this (((deliberate))) propaganda piece of character assassination and wholly accept it as valid ....
[–]Intrixina0 points
3 points
3 points
(+3|-0)
ago
The only reason that Hitler wasn't accepted into that art school was because said art school was pushing cultural marxist trash instead of artworks which actually look like things.
[–]chian_chiu1 point
11 points
12 points
(+12|-1)
ago
V/museum has been doing that for a very long time without any of the obnoxious glow in the dark rhetoric. Why don't you paint a picture a day instead? Maybe someone will post about you one day.
I've posted art in the sub before, it was pretty well-received. Just don't post anything with nudity in it, even tasteful art; they seem to really hate anything of that nature there.
I think they're focused on aesthetic beauty. Anyone with a butt can be sexually attractive, that's not necessarily unique to white people, it's the colors and the facial structure that make white beauty uniquely white.
Ignore the jerks and their sarcasm. Your Day 1 post was fantastic. I've never heard of that artist or seen that painting, and it made me happy to see it. Keep it up. The encouraging posts all have good suggestions, particularly that of including the name of the artist, the painting, and the year it was painted.
Sort: Top
[–] nul 0 points 23 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago
Not to self shill, but I've been doing this for awhile in /v/kult and I encourage you to join!
[–] KingMortales 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Very nice, subbed.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
[–] dassaer 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I know right.. Something always felt off to me after I noticed years ago the (((history))) documentaries and paid msm talking heads always propagating the 'failed artist...' trope while never showing any artworks, as if the statement was proof in itself and didn't need any corroborating evidence .... Then some ytube channel i stumbled on had a whole show about his artworks. Suffice to say even now, People will hear and repeat this (((deliberate))) propaganda piece of character assassination and wholly accept it as valid ....
[–] Intrixina 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The only reason that Hitler wasn't accepted into that art school was because said art school was pushing cultural marxist trash instead of artworks which actually look like things.
[–] KingMortales 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm most of the way through Mein Kampf; he studied to be an architect and considered architecture to be one of the great arts along with music.
[–] MrPim 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
Please include a little info if you can. This for example is Hip Hip Hurra 1888 by Peder Severin Kroyer.
[–] chian_chiu 1 point 11 points 12 points (+12|-1) ago
V/museum has been doing that for a very long time without any of the obnoxious glow in the dark rhetoric. Why don't you paint a picture a day instead? Maybe someone will post about you one day.
[–] Ocelot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What glow in the dark rhetoric?
[–] gabara 1 point 10 points 11 points (+11|-1) ago
Do it! Maybe you could use v/WhiteBeauty to post them if the folks there are okay with it.
[–] Splooge 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Came here to say exactly this.
I've posted art in the sub before, it was pretty well-received. Just don't post anything with nudity in it, even tasteful art; they seem to really hate anything of that nature there.
[–] Niggardly_Jew 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I think they're focused on aesthetic beauty. Anyone with a butt can be sexually attractive, that's not necessarily unique to white people, it's the colors and the facial structure that make white beauty uniquely white.
[–] Neon_daemon 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
We need record keepers too. Editors, Curators and presentors. The userbase changes fast on voat but the shills stay and feed on newb's ignorance
[–] TrialsAndTribulation 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Ignore the jerks and their sarcasm. Your Day 1 post was fantastic. I've never heard of that artist or seen that painting, and it made me happy to see it. Keep it up. The encouraging posts all have good suggestions, particularly that of including the name of the artist, the painting, and the year it was painted.
[–] boekanier 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Good idea. But mention name of the maker and the date. Don't forget 17th century painters like Jan Steen and so on.