[–] user9713 2 points 45 points (+47|-2) ago  (edited ago)

And all of them would have a vote.

If voting mattered, 2016-2018 would've been great for right-wingers.

Instead, we got more liberal policies.

If we still plan to vote, we'll have to start being involved in state, and even local, politics, and elect candidates who are not afraid to secede from the union. With this option, we at least have leverage over the federal government or red states secede and reclaim their lost power.

One reason I prefer secession is because, right now, red states have no control over their borders, and I'm not just talking about foreign immigration, I'm also talking about liberals who migrate from the blue states they fucked up then vote to fuck up red states. That's just as big a threat as legal and illegal immigration.

Anyway, that's how I feel about voting.

[–] trevmon 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

there should be a wall around each red state. also in blue states that are only blue because of big cities but have right wing maga suburbs, put a wall around the city to keep people in.

[–] user9713 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Amen!

blue states that are only blue because of big cities but have right wing maga suburbs, put a wall around the city to keep people in.

And not just build a wall, but I also believe they should just form a new state. This is often talked about with California but, sadly, hasn't picked up steam.

[–] Delacourt 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

I am 100% in favor of voting but you make a great point. Secession is the probably best goal to have at this point, or maybe some kind of policy that would powerfully exclude cities that have fallen to the far-left. The sheriffs declaring their counties as sanctuaries for the Second Amendment have the right idea.

There should be a subverse about this.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Secession is the probably best goal to have at this point

In order to secede, you need to have more power than they have to keep you in.

And if you have sufficient power to just walk out against their will, why not use that power and just kill em all and take all the land?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] PatriotLady1 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

There needs to be a cleansing. Get rid of all laws pertaining to special populations. Get rid of females voting. There I said it.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

There will be no shortage of people ready and willing to declare independence from the union.

But none of the will be willing to declare independence FROM THE JEW.

As as soon as they get their independence from the union, the jewish game will beginn anew, and they will get just another, but smaller union, with the same set of problems that plagued the larger union they seceded from.

[–] TXRepublicMovement 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Yes. Get involved in your state politics. Build alliances.

[–] The1stLantern 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The minute the union disipates is the same moment the rest of the world dogpiles the weakened US. You cant honestly think theyd stay out of it.

[–] TheFlameOfTruth 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I advocate for the first step of conservatives coming out to Oregon and Washington, as the populations are still low enough that a million or two could hard flip it red. From there, if the "Big five" in the PNW were hard red and real elections are useless, secession would be a viable option. Then build the wall and slowly absorb states that want to join.

[–] Delacourt 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I did some research and if all conservative voters moved out of California and New York the rest of the US would be solid red. We really need to push movement to more conservative states.

[–] TXRepublicMovement 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

It could join TX via the mountain and plains states. Pacific to Atlantic.

[–] Dumb_Comment_Bot 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago 

How about we just don't have welfare which enables parasitic behaviour instead of killing people?

Cheaper option too.

[–] elchupanibre5 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Also, no welfare = instant reduction of illegal immigrants.

[–] BlowjaySimpson 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

There's a reason they tell you not to feed the wildlife at Yellowstone.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

How about we just don't have welfare

You have to get rid of democracy first.

The people who receive welfare are allowed to vote and surprise, they vote for the welfare they receive.

Welfare isnt the CAUSE of parasitic behavior, welfare is the CONSEQUENCE of everybody --including the parasites-- being allowed to vote.

[–] Approved 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's both.

[–] TheFlameOfTruth 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Bingo, or at least drastically cut it. There should be a cap on how many children increase your gibs. After sign up, no more increase per child. The point is to keep people responsible, not starve children... but there are children starving because the money is going to illegals and human xerox machines, "fur mah gibs"

[–] PatriotLady1 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

One pregnancy that's it. If the kid dies or you lose it prior to birth....done. Tough shit. In fact, why help them at all? When they stay on welfare and have to "work", we pay for that. They don't get jobs out in the real world. It's through TANF. Look it up. We pay them to work!

[–] BlowjaySimpson 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

How about if you have 2 children already, and you still want more welfare, you have to be sterilized.

[–] madscientist3469 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I absolutely agree with this. Get rid of the welfare state, then the only people coming here will be forced to be productive citizens.

[–] fightknightHERO 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

[–] TrialsAndTribulation 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

All of them would have a vote.

Not if each state re-enacted literacy tests and English-only ballots. That would weed out a lot of ineligible voters. And niggers.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you have the power to ban anyone from voting, why not use that power and ban niggers and women outright? You dont need a faggy pretext.

[–] BlowjaySimpson 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Land owners only.

[–] drakesdoom2 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

They would be over double their number by now. We would already be a failed state.

[–] tomdogg [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Wakanda irl except it would be more like Sierra Leone or South Africa.

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Before the welfare state, black population pretty much stayed 10-12% for generations. That why Mexicans were needed.

[–] BlowjaySimpson 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"needed".

[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And that's why (((they))) make abortion available to them.

Don't you get it? THIS IS THE SLOW BOIL. By slightly hamstringing the nigger's breeding rates, it gives humans a lot of time to get "used to" the savage behavior of these animals.

If there were 50% more niggers in the USA in like year 2000, we'd already have had our second Civil War.

[–] Base311 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Also think how many more there would be if it were not allowing them their own country Liberia.

[–] dudelol 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago 

Anti life faggotry, no thanks satan

[–] CameraCode0 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Every black that is born likely means an innocent person that is killed or assaulted. Blacks aren't innocent from birth.

[–] u_r_wat_u_eat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Abortions are how the jews get their baby consumption fix

[–] VulgarChristian 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Or we would be forced to take care of the actual problem....

[–] nmgoh2 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

For all their talk The KKK's lifetime kill count has nothing on Planned Parenthood's numbers this year alone.

load more comments ▼ (52 remaining)