Archived And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler into power (i.postimg.cc)
submitted ago by Recyclops14
Posted by: Recyclops14
Posting time: 1.6 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/24/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 2348
SCP: 202
206 upvotes, 4 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
Archived And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler into power (i.postimg.cc)
submitted ago by Recyclops14
Sort: Top
[–] CameraCode0 0 points 37 points 37 points (+37|-0) ago
I was never taught in school that the National Socialists were voted into power. They like to skip over that.
[–] Obvy_throwaway52 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
They alway used words and phrases such as "took over", which implies they did it without the people's consent.
[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
They were part of a coalition government with Adolf Hitler appoint chancellor under President von Hindenburg. Hindenburg didn't really like Hitler but he feared the Communists far more. Communism made Hitler and National Socialism possible.
[–] Creggieb ago
Really? My history class was very clear about how the nazi party was voted into office,. With increasing levels of support. Starting out like kind of a joke party, not really taken seriously, then slowly gaining political traction over a period of years.
Kind of hard not to when then political meetings of other parties start getting violently broken up by the brown shirts. And then the Reichstag catches fire. This "mysterious accident" prompts the German patriot act, granting emergency powers to the Fuhrer, who uses these powers to expand his powers. The "votes" after this point are about as meaningful as a vote in North Korea today. Voting for, and belonging to the party were pretty much mandatory for success, and eventually survival. A vote in this case is a show of interest in ones own well being, and not necessarily an endorsement of the leaders policies
[–] Lord_Kristopf 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
What would you say is the worst aspect of that degeneracy snapshot? The kid involvement? The parental/guardians approving/permission for said kid? The wider normalization of the behavior? Something else?
[–] Recyclops14 [S] 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago (edited ago)
I guess to be more specific to the word degenerate I would say the wider acceptance of the perverse display. In the original post this women is suggesting she's strong because she's doing burlesque for money. She said the mother came up and said "thank you for showing her that being a strong women is ok" as if dancing for stripper tips is some how empowering.
Edit: Here
[–] Lord_Kristopf 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
A very fair assessment. Pretty soon that burlesque broad will instead be a drag queen and they’ll trying to teach little boys a lesson about embracing your gender confusion and body dysmorphia.
[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks. For some reason when I expand or open the OP it now shows a screenshot from some animated movie. I'd suggest using a different imagehost in future.
[–] iLuvJews 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Was that actually a woman or a man in drag?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The father.
[–] Soyboy69 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
the fact that they felt comfortable enough in the legality that they uploaded the picture to the internet, meanwhile an ebil straight white male must fear getting sent nudes by a girl who lied about her age or having a photo of him giving her a kiss lest he be locked up for decades on as a felon and sex offender.
[–] TestForScience 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
All of it together.
Every bit of it adds up into 'modern liberals'
[–] TheTrigger 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Link got shoad. Don't know if that's a bad thing, judging by that thumbnail. :/
[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
[–] slaver469 ago
That is fucking gross.
[–] Recyclops14 [S] ago
Link works fine for me. Not sure why people are having trouble with it.
[–] MockingDead 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Weimar
[–] Afrowasp1 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Honk...
[–] 18229395? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No one has yet pointed out that Hitler was appointed, not voted into office? I guess I'm just nitpicky about accuracy.
[–] Recyclops14 [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
43% for the NSDAP, considering how fractured their system was, was pretty good. He was appointed indeed by his party, it was a parliamentary system. I still say he was elected, seeing as how the party who was democratically elected appointed him. Threw the enabling act and coalitions he eventually became chancellor.
[–] 18230389? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Even though you technically admitted to being incorrect, your answer is so well-versed and informative, I'm giving you this one anyway.
[–] 18228731? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What's up with that ladies hand? Is she holding her severed hand?
[–] Recyclops14 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Which one? If you mean the one in the blue she's leaning over with her phone to take a picture.