[–] EnterTheUnKnown 0 points 29 points (+29|-0) ago 

I haven't seen a claim of no terrorism this fast since Vegas.

[–] CameraCode0 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

If it is proven that it was terrorism, think of the spark that would cause. People are already fed up and literally rioting in the streets. Attack a religious symbol and people will go mad. This is and absolutely historic event.

[–] HndrxMn 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Exactly. Sounds like CYA for those that don't want a revolution to run sideways on them. Could it have been a dumbass on the renovation team? Possibly, but the timing is too convenient. I can see a muslim or jew working on the team with a personal vendetta, though, but that would bring us back to a terrorist act.

[–] watts2db 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

its more than a religious symbol its a historic cultural and national one a national treasure

[–] GoodLordAgain1 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

It's Holy Week, this was probably some fucking shitskinned migrant laborer.

[–] watchers 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

they will do everything possible to keep any migrant involvement out of the news if it exists.

[–] CapinBoredface 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Especially since the internet is already full of people calling for retaliation.

[–] LibertarianForChrist 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It takes days to complete investigations. This is as much a lie as the passports in new york.

[–] BloatedVoatGoat 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you trust the accident report trust me when I say it will be genuinely safe for your faggot ass to go to some Islamic ran shitholes and be accepted. No probs at all, koombyeyeah shit.

[–] LetItGo 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Just commented on another thread, but the statement I saw elsewhere (can't remember where) was along the lines of "Arson and terrorism have been ruled out, for now." - meanwhile articles are coming out leaving out the "for now" or separating it by another sentence knowing full well people are going to act only on the initial.

Wish I had saved the link but was at work and now can't remember who posted it. A Breaking News account is all I recall.

[–] Decidueye 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Obvious bullshit since an arson investigation can't be done until the flames are extinguished, which they weren't when that statement came out.

[–] LetItGo 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Oh I completely agree. Just pointing out how articles are leaving out the "for now" section, which completely changes the statement.

The events leading up to this, including the thwarted terror attack on Friday, make it pretty much impossible to believe it was not intentional. They are trying to say a "random flame" ignited the worksite. What flame? Give us an item at least with a pilot light, though it'd still not be believable. Afaik, no workers were on the actual job site and there have been reports that they are saying it was intentional, not the fault of the workers or their supplies/tools.

[–] Saturday405 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's good information right there.

[–] LetItGo 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Sorry if it seemed a bit more like conjecture. After doing another generic search, it looks like a few bigger name news entities, like Washington Times, quote the sentence in full. For some reason I can't connect to archive.is from my home internet or I'd throw up a few links for information's sake.

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Agreed.

Creating conclusions today is stupid and false either way - we (and they) don't know if it was deliberate or accident, if it was terrorism or sabotage, if it was clumsiness or malicious.

It's just too damn early to make conclusions.

[–] 404_SLEEP_NOT_FOUND 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The building has been going 800 years strong. Seems like it was intentional.

[–] jimibulgin 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I know literally nothing about this other than it happened and I'm already convinced its Zionist fuckery. Pavlov anyone?

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)