You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]Acerphoon0 points13 points13 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Acerphoon0 points
13 points
13 points
(+13|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
People will say that "lines of code written" isn't a good measure. - But even then, what did she do?
The algorithm wasn't developed by her, it was from a japanese team. She didn't really write anything good into the code, just the ability to change the color and font size of the bar.
She copied someone else's code.
What did she do? Why is she important?
Some will say: "She was the team leader" - But she wasn't. She was the leader of ONE of the many teams. - This was the leader: https://bhi.fas.harvard.edu/people/avi-loeb
So, again, what did she do? We now know that she:
- Didn't write much of the code.
- The stuff that she wrote, was only for the User Interface
- She copied someone else's code.
- She wasn't the leader of the project.
- The algorithm wasn't her idea.
So, what exactly does she get credit for? For being a member of the team? - I understand that, but then why don't the others?
Ding, ding, ding. This is exactly how science can be broken. By having the mediator of pop-science media come between it and the public, to push the political narrative rather than the truth. Just like how the story now is that three black women are what got John Glenn into space. If you control the press, you can write history.
[–]SerialChiller0 points
5 points
5 points
(+5|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
So, what exactly does she get credit for?
For being a female associated with a high visibility technical project, at a time when the narrative desperately needs 'role models' to deceive impressionable girls who might otherwise not choose to waste their lives on a glamorous programming 'career'.
The actual woman in the story is an accomplished engineer and no doubt very qualified. However, the hype is all about her being a female in a STEM field.
[–]curiouserdude0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
The idea is to promote and reinforce a conflict narrative with the end goal being oligarchical globalism controlled by bankers.
The narrative is Women (or any minority group) are smart and are natural top engineers and would achieve greatness, but the white patriarchy must be swept away in order to achieve this and that means nationalism must surrender to global governance by a diverse set of unaccountable corrupt not very smart puppet teleprompter readers who you will love and respect no matter what they do because they are members of your race/gender/ethnicity/sexual orientation.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Acerphoon 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago (edited ago)
People will say that "lines of code written" isn't a good measure. - But even then, what did she do?
The algorithm wasn't developed by her, it was from a japanese team. She didn't really write anything good into the code, just the ability to change the color and font size of the bar.
She copied someone else's code.
What did she do? Why is she important?
Some will say: "She was the team leader" - But she wasn't. She was the leader of ONE of the many teams. - This was the leader: https://bhi.fas.harvard.edu/people/avi-loeb
So, again, what did she do? We now know that she:
- Didn't write much of the code.
- The stuff that she wrote, was only for the User Interface
- She copied someone else's code.
- She wasn't the leader of the project.
- The algorithm wasn't her idea.
So, what exactly does she get credit for? For being a member of the team? - I understand that, but then why don't the others?
[–] drozzxd 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Jewish nepotism in action.
[–] chirogonemd 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Ding, ding, ding. This is exactly how science can be broken. By having the mediator of pop-science media come between it and the public, to push the political narrative rather than the truth. Just like how the story now is that three black women are what got John Glenn into space. If you control the press, you can write history.
[–] SerialChiller 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
For being a female associated with a high visibility technical project, at a time when the narrative desperately needs 'role models' to deceive impressionable girls who might otherwise not choose to waste their lives on a glamorous programming 'career'.
The actual woman in the story is an accomplished engineer and no doubt very qualified. However, the hype is all about her being a female in a STEM field.
[–] curiouserdude 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
The idea is to promote and reinforce a conflict narrative with the end goal being oligarchical globalism controlled by bankers.
The narrative is Women (or any minority group) are smart and are natural top engineers and would achieve greatness, but the white patriarchy must be swept away in order to achieve this and that means nationalism must surrender to global governance by a diverse set of unaccountable corrupt not very smart puppet teleprompter readers who you will love and respect no matter what they do because they are members of your race/gender/ethnicity/sexual orientation.
[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Her vagina.
[–] vastrightwing 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Obviously you aren't that familiar with affirmative action.