You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Yes. Indirectly funding terrorists is less potent than directly funding terrorists. Both are treason that deserves a hanging, but directly > indirectly.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Sosacms 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Well... When you're already aware of the US directly funding/training terrorists... The Benghazi pill isn't very potent.
[–] TheSeer 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It was how HRC created ISIS, with built-in plausible deniability, and you think it isn't 'very potent'???
[–] Sosacms ago
Yes. Indirectly funding terrorists is less potent than directly funding terrorists. Both are treason that deserves a hanging, but directly > indirectly.