You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] TheSeer [S] ago 

Even Isaac Newton thought the accepted Chronology of his day was erroneous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chronology_of_Ancient_Kingdoms_Amended

"The book attempts to revise the accepted ancient chronology of Newton's day, in order to prove that Solomon was the earliest king in the world, and that his Temple the first ever built, with all others being copies, beginning with Sesostris, King of Egypt, followed by others. Newton's results, therefore, diverge widely from presently accepted dates, often more widely than the system that he attempted to displace.

Newton attempted to identify various mythological figures as historical or Biblical individuals, such as arguing that the Titan Saturn was Noah, the god Jupiter was Shem, and Osiris and Dionysus were Sesostris.[2] The work treats figures from Greek mythology, such as the centaur Chiron and the Argonauts, as historical fact"

You didn't answer my question when BC/AD dating was adopted, nor when cement/concrete was developed, (plus when it became widely used).

I don't even know what your question is. When was history made fraudulent? Over decades, possibly more than a century, between 1550-1700 roughly. When was 'ancient Egypt's chronology widely known by scholars? That is what you have to realize, this was all done for a purpose. The more ancient, the more prestigious.

That is why you are so against the idea that Plethon wrote what we today call Plato's work, because then it is 'merely' 600 years old, not 2400. For me, it just provides context into who financed and funded the work, and what their motives may have been (which is pretty clear, given the context).

0
1

[–] TrialsAndTribulation 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Here you go. Let me know when you're ready to take your place among these esteemed intellects.

https://web.archive.org/web/19990218204511/http://www.teleport.com/%7Edkossy/librqsch.html