You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-2

[–] VoatsNewfag 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Was your comment, that it's our fault that women are like that because we describe them to be that way, sarcasm?

If so how does Poe's law not apply? There is nothing that indicates sarcasm and people genuinely make that argument even on voat.

3
-2

[–] Big_Willy_Wallace 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Hint of advice for you: when a user continues to say "nigger" and "kike" over and over, it's a tell-tale sign of a shill. They do that because A: they think people talk like that, and B. they think it makes them look like the more committed voater. What else is she saying besides "nigger"? Nonsense. That's the point. Muddy the waters and agitate people, both to prevent clear thinking.

2
-1

[–] VoatsNewfag 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

If she is a paid shill someone is wasting a lot of money.

But I don't think she is. Maybe she is a troll but I suspect it's simply her personality. Looking at her comment history (to evaluate if she is a shill) she makes plenty of one-sentence insults on fatpeoplehate and /v/niggers and they are quite popular over there judging by upvotes.

But the moment someone makes a generalization about women she can't resist to correct the record like here: https://voat.co/v/whatever/3061791/17027712 or get all pissed like in this thread. Seems rather hypocritical and funny to me.

But I get your point she is not the most reasonable to have a discussion with and I agree. However I usually debate for the sake of convincing bystanders therefore I don't mind.