Anon Archived "And we have more women in Congress than any time before" THAT'S THE F*CKING PROBLEM. (whatever)
submitted ago by [deleted]
Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1526
SCP: 265
273 upvotes, 8 downvotes (97% upvoted it)
Anon Archived "And we have more women in Congress than any time before" THAT'S THE F*CKING PROBLEM. (whatever)
submitted ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
[–] lion4liberty 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
Most women did not want the right to vote. You need to look into the kind of (((people))) that pushed for the right to vote for women. Universal suffrage is a mistake, always has and always will.
[–] 16606041? 1 point 11 points 12 points (+12|-1) ago (edited ago)
land owning white males or white males with children. That is the only way to vote. Only those groups have a reasonable reason to take care of the nation and its borders and people. If this was the case we would have bases on other planets and could get there through wormholes instead we work like slaves to feed niggers limitless fried chicken until they swell to colossal size then pay armies of skilled medical people to try to 'save them' while watching our families starve and die.
[–] GapingAnus ago
The more I think about this, the less I think it ought to be a digital solution where you either vote or don't.
You can't effectively limit something to white males or white males with children because you run into (among other) some interesting problems like what is "white"? Many of the people most americans would consider white, I wouldn't. What about children? Do you count if you're divorced and your wife took the kids? Do you count if you adopt? Do you count if you're shit genetics trailer trash with an IQ of 75? What if you're more genetically white than Warren yet you're a genetic dead end from suburbia and are half-way through a gender studies and extreme baristaing course?
You also have to give incentives and promote social mobility. People who do the work, should get the perks. Bad luck or a raw deal in life should not exclude you from society. Intent and proficiency should matter.
An a la carte form of citizenship would be better, I think. Simply by virtue of being born in the country, you should get certain inalienable rights. By performing some civil service you ought to get others. Military service might be one. Voluntary civil service might be another. Voting without passing even the most rudimentary civics test is probably not a good idea. Maybe an obligatory course in basic home economics before you're allowed to accrue debt, shit like that. We already do some of this with things like aging: we don't let 6 year olds vote.
[–] CameraCode 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Women's suffrage and it's consequences have been a disaster for both men and women.
[–] lion4liberty ago
Even the Ancients knew.
[–] Race_War_Now ago
Do you have a source for this? If this is true I could really use it in future discussions.
[–] lion4liberty ago
Its hard to find specific sources on numbers because its not politically correct but I found this...Of the 575,000 voting women in the state, only 22,204 cared for it enough to deposit in a ballot box an affirmative answer to this question.