So we all know that liberal media outlets are all separate mouth pieces for the same entity. That's why their stories all line up, why they have the same opinion, and why they have the same obscure dogmas that two individuals couldn't come to separately. The coordinating entity isn't some hidden organization. It's Media Matters. They run the news at the direction of Soros.
Shortly after the election an internal memo was leaked from Media Matters. It was a scalding letter to their own staff. Basically it said they need to improve their game on social media. Why? Well it articulated why. They haden't "dominated" social media to the same standard they set for broadcast media. They clearly had the stronger hand on most mainstream social media. Saying something positive about DT was basically illegal on Facebook while liberals shared their banal orange man bad posts with impunity. Facebook was a liberal place but this was not good enough for Media Matters. They expected there to be zero posts from the opposition.
I say this to illustrate the nature of Media Matters and the media in general. These kinds of complaints weren't written about their performance in broadcast and written journalism. It's an admission that they had that kind of control.
So what we know from this is that Media Matters is the centralized coordinator for accepted opinion, that the media 100% works for media matter, and the media matters is interested in more than one medium to brainwash people.
So my point is these layoffs at multiple places are an illustration that media matters no longer see these people as useful. If I were trying to direct the US towards a communist revolution I would see them as useful. The only way they are not useful is if media matters discovered something more useful. These media organizations are largely a financial sink. Diluted plurality ownership is used to control these companies and direct their actions. So they are partially owned by or as a sibling to media matters. and are directed to operate in spite of loss by their owners, and in the particular way their are to operate (more explicitly signaled by one of the part owned organizations, media matters).
The owners decided to take financial losses elsewhere and political gains elsewhere. What are they investing in now?
tl;dr: This is a pivot. Why did they pivot?
Sort: Top
[–] Approved ago
I find it interesting that the mass layoffs coincide with the government shutdown going into its second month.
Almost as if certain entities were never profitable, and were financed entirelly by the "combating foreign propaganda" money in the 2017-2018 budget.