You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 7 points -4 points (+3|-7) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think people died. There's a lot more to the truth than the "official story" obviously, but I don't doubt that all these people were murdered by some alphabet agency operative, or perhaps a foreign operative.

My original theory was that this was some kind of weapons smuggling operation gone bad somehow. Paddock may have actually been smuggling the weapons to sell to whomever. But I think he discovered that he was somehow being set up, so he said "fuck it, I'll blow this entire operation open by opening fire on those people down there" in the hopes that his death would at least bring down whoever he was working for.

But it didn't work out. The special "clean-up" the alphabet agencies pulled off here was disturbingly effective. I even believe some police who were involved with actions inside of the hotel may have been threatened or otherwise blackmailed into silence.

The alternative, and widely accepted theory, is that this was staged in order to advance gun control, targeting bump stocks in the "chipping away your rights" method. I think this was just an opportunity that (((they))) jumped on when their agent, Paddock or whoever was actually in that room, went rogue and shot a bunch of people up. "Never let a good disaster go to waste".

0
0

[–] SubspaceDistortion ago 

The survivors ended up dead though. Some of them at least.. I haven't counted.

0
0

[–] MeWalterKovacs ago 

Crisis actors drifted into public consciousness and I believe after Sandy Hook, real life loss was required. Too hard to suppress recognition of people allegedly killed in the information age.