You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] EnterTheUnKnown [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I cant wait. I dont like to play sides (left vs right) but when whe goes it will then be 6-3 (right vs left). Looking good for the constitutionalists. Maybe we can get some gun rights bacl. Federal CCP. (I personally think abortions are a good thing, statistically speaking)

0
3

[–] ArchmageMordenkainen 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I used to think the same thing about abortions, but here's the thing. Numerically, there might be a lot of sheboons getting them, but when you normalize for income, I believe white women are overrepresented in abortions. But the real big thing is the change in what would happen if abortions were to get banned. Low-income Tauqiyas are far more inelastic about their demand for abortion where crime is concerned--that is to say, abortions being illegal isn't going to stop them from getting an abortion, they'll just go into a back alley with a coat hanger if they have to. But whites who get abortions tend to be law-abiding, and if abortions were illegal they wouldn't get them. So banning abortions would increase the birthrate of whites, but not change black rates too much.

0
0

[–] oioiiooi ago 

The 2nd amendment is the federal CCP. States are connected to the bill of rights through selective incorporation and other case history but the fed is bound directly by our first statute. States have been doing flanking maneuvers on the bill of rights via the courts but the fed doesn't have that option.