You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
This is why "Reagan", aka Bush Sr., created amnesty. The country was so republican they needed new browns/democrats to vote otherwise their charade of a (((two party system))) would be ruined. 1992 was also the last year there was a third party in the main presidential debates.
[+]Crazyjoe330 points7 points7 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Crazyjoe330 points
7 points
7 points
(+7|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
The entire concept of the "two party" system confounds me. I get that it's a tool for dividing us up, but it's crazy at how ferocious people can get over which side is better, no matter what.
Like football on steroids.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] TeddyJackson 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
This is why "Reagan", aka Bush Sr., created amnesty. The country was so republican they needed new browns/democrats to vote otherwise their charade of a (((two party system))) would be ruined. 1992 was also the last year there was a third party in the main presidential debates.
[–] Crazyjoe33 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
The entire concept of the "two party" system confounds me. I get that it's a tool for dividing us up, but it's crazy at how ferocious people can get over which side is better, no matter what. Like football on steroids.
[–] EyeOfHorus 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Because the debate is a private debate owned by the Dems and Reps. The league of women voters no longer arranges the debate. The system is fixed.
[–] TeddyJackson ago
+1 for the Beta squad