You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Sure, but I can assure you we don’t have shield maiden caliber serving right now. Shit a Bitch gets knocked up and has like 6 months off then another limited duty chit if she wants it. It’s a crock of shit. Trust me I would know.
during the same eras though if you were a hazzard to your unit they would have killed you and went on with their day thinking nothing of it. Maybe they would have waited for a battle and said the other side did it maybe not, but you were not going to be protected if your being there risked the lives of the others. There will always be exceptions to any rule so saying but this one time will always be true, but often not important. It was a mistake on obvious's part to word the title the way he did where one exception disproves it all. "no ____ in the history of time" statements will nearly all turn out to be false. Even in this example it started with "No army in the history of time has been afraid of fags and broads." Then turned into needing to be "entire armies". In two posts I figured out no point in discussing this with him as crudomatic pointed out he will just move the goalpost.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ArmourFou 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
They're famous for having many gays amongst their ranks.
As far as women soldiers go there were the Amazons, Norse shield maidens, and a sprinkling of women around the world.
[–] reichnarok 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sure, but I can assure you we don’t have shield maiden caliber serving right now. Shit a Bitch gets knocked up and has like 6 months off then another limited duty chit if she wants it. It’s a crock of shit. Trust me I would know.
[–] Thrus2 ago
during the same eras though if you were a hazzard to your unit they would have killed you and went on with their day thinking nothing of it. Maybe they would have waited for a battle and said the other side did it maybe not, but you were not going to be protected if your being there risked the lives of the others. There will always be exceptions to any rule so saying but this one time will always be true, but often not important. It was a mistake on obvious's part to word the title the way he did where one exception disproves it all. "no ____ in the history of time" statements will nearly all turn out to be false. Even in this example it started with "No army in the history of time has been afraid of fags and broads." Then turned into needing to be "entire armies". In two posts I figured out no point in discussing this with him as crudomatic pointed out he will just move the goalpost.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
[–] ArmourFou 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
You're right, they did have a of gays.