You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Are you saying they had entire armies of homos and bitches?

1
2

[–] CrudOMatic 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

entire armies

Did I just witness a goalpost move?

0
0

[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] ago 

I said, we don't need women and fags in our military/army. Someone replied with no direct evidence saying, "Greeks, Romans and Japanese." Since no evidence beyond listing those three groups was posted, I responded with the question of whether they had entire armies/military with comprised of women and faggots. Then you start talking about goal posts with no context either.

So what is it, did they have entire military of just women and fags or did women and fags play some absolute pivotal roles in their wars that they would have otherwise lost?

0
0

[–] thelma ago 

entire militaries ...

1
2

[–] ArmourFou 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

They're famous for having many gays amongst their ranks.

As far as women soldiers go there were the Amazons, Norse shield maidens, and a sprinkling of women around the world.

0
1

[–] reichnarok 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sure, but I can assure you we don’t have shield maiden caliber serving right now. Shit a Bitch gets knocked up and has like 6 months off then another limited duty chit if she wants it. It’s a crock of shit. Trust me I would know.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] WhoreOfBabylon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago