Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 2.2 years ago on 10/11/2018 9:10:53 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 1/10/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 450
SCP: 139
144 upvotes, 5 downvotes (97% upvoted it)
~123 user(s) here now
This subverse is a catch-all subverse. If you don't want to classify your submission or don't care about where it belongs, post it here. Anything goes.
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived Account Deleted By User (i.imgtc.com)
submitted 2.2 years ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
[–] englishwebster 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) 2.2 years ago
this is textbook gaslighting. someone on voat isnt our friend.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) 2.2 years ago
[–] englishwebster 6 points -1 points 5 points (+5|-6) 2.2 years ago
not at all. simply that encouraging violence is best left for hillary clinton and her ilk from a pure optics point of view.
were here to win an election
[–] ABastionOfFreeSpeech 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2.2 years ago
This ain't gaslighting. False flagging, probably, or an agent provocateur.
[–] I_AM_POTATO 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2.2 years ago
How is this gaslighting? Granted the google definition of gaslighting makes no sense to me. Especially on how it's used in contemporary English.
[–] englishwebster 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) 2.2 years ago (edited 2.2 years ago)
by trying to suggest that half the population of america is not only worth shooting but you should look forward to doing it.
/u/1quickdub doesnt know any better but thats ok
view the rest of the comments →
[–] englishwebster 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) ago
this is textbook gaslighting. someone on voat isnt our friend.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
[–] englishwebster 6 points -1 points 5 points (+5|-6) ago
not at all. simply that encouraging violence is best left for hillary clinton and her ilk from a pure optics point of view.
were here to win an election
[–] ABastionOfFreeSpeech 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This ain't gaslighting. False flagging, probably, or an agent provocateur.
[–] I_AM_POTATO 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
How is this gaslighting? Granted the google definition of gaslighting makes no sense to me. Especially on how it's used in contemporary English.
[–] englishwebster 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
by trying to suggest that half the population of america is not only worth shooting but you should look forward to doing it.
/u/1quickdub doesnt know any better but thats ok