You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Good goy! Don't try to influence anyone ever or convert them to your side. Helping to shape society's narratives doesn't matter at all. Just let yourselves be endlessly slandered without response until almost everyone is whipped up into a mindless frenzy against you and then accept your extermination.
That's not what I'm saying at all, but thanks for creating a strawman argument. You took one sentence, and ignored the greater context. Congrats.
Boomers are dying off. The kids are the normies we want to persuade, and they're the 'YouTube fail compilation" generation that loves seeing people hoisted on their own petard.
Yeah, and most of them are less intelligent than their boomer parents. They're the millennials and gen xer's we're dealing with here. They're the same people who are only too happy to swallow what the media is telling them. They're a lost cause if you want to keep playing by the rules that they're accustomed to. Cognitive dissonance doesn't even register to them. The hypocrisy you point out is amusing for a second, then they ignore it. I've seen it time after time again. It's why we constantly see this "left versus right" divide. They blindly follow a side and forget about thinking critically quite often.
You don't think anybody's ever been redpilled or made more aware by the side they think they belong to proving to be hypocritical or stupid? There are ex-lefties all over sites like this.
I imagine those numbers become less and less, not more and more. 5 years ago? You'd have a strong case. A year ago? Probably still a strong case. Again, look no further than the refugees we got here lately. Come up with a different game for them to follow.
The whole point of this is to rebrand "free speech" to make people confront their own erroneous thinking about either it or diversity.
You actually don't need to rebrand it to do that. They'll shout along the lines, "not all muslims!" and other nonsense and ignore you. Go ahead, try it. Tell us how far you get.
PS: Coming up with clever ways of exposing their hypocrisy isn't playing by their rules.
By using their chosen terminologies and their methods to expose them is exactly playing by their rules. And if you haven't noticed, the rules never apply to them.
[+]Sockhereye1 point-1 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Sockhereye[S]1 point
-1 points
0 points
(+0|-1)
ago
(edited ago)
That's not what I'm saying at all, but thanks for creating a strawman argument. You took one sentence, and ignored the greater context. Congrats.
Your whole post sure sounds like defeatism.
Yeah, and most of them are less intelligent than their boomer parents. They're the millennials and gen xer's we're dealing with here.
The kids are Gen Z, not Gen X, and I would bet that Gen Zs and millennials constitute the majority on this site, so I'm not sure how they're a "lost cause". What's your solution? "The kids are dumb so just give them up."
I imagine those numbers become less and less, not more and more.
I agree that when you're converting people away from a dominant cultural paradigm your gains diminish over time as you suck up all of the people who were mostly reasonable in the first place and only true believers and apathetic normalfags are left. But that doesn't mean you just stop, since there are new people (kids/teens) growing into their first age of reason every day. The moment an idea stops trying to influence new people is the moment it commits to death.
You actually don't need to rebrand it to do that. They'll shout along the lines, "not all muslims!" and other nonsense and ignore you. Go ahead, try it. Tell us how far you get.
Yeah and getting them to shout and look stupid is pointless. Thanks Schlomo.
By using their chosen terminologies and their methods to expose them is exactly playing by their rules
"Diversity" isn't their terminology. It's a word they hijacked. And exposing hypocrisy isn't "their method", as they're the biggest hypocrites in the world. It's universal.
That's due to your inability to not understand context. I keep mentioning try a different avenue, as the current one doesn't work as well as you believe it to.
The kids are Gen Z, not Gen X, and I would bet that Gen Zs and millennials constitute the majority on this site, so I'm not sure how they're a "lost cause". What's your solution? "The kids are dumb so just give them up."
I never said the kids were Gen X. I was mentioning how the different generations seem to follow the same footsteps. I would wager the majority on this constitute Millennials and Gen X, with Gen Z being a minority. Again, my point about them being a lost cause is in reference to the tactics you wish to keep using. I'm not telling you to give up, I'm telling you to find a different way.
Why do you insist on misrepresenting what I've stated?
But that doesn't mean you just stop,
But I never said to stop. I said to try a different way. In the rest of the paragraph I didn't quote, you admit to diminishing returns.
Again, I ask why you insist on misrepresenting things.
Yeah and getting them to shout and look stupid is pointless. Thanks Schlomo.
You admitted already there was diminishing returns. Do you not remember what you write from one minute to the next? Getting them to do the same thing that we've been doing just simply doesn't work as well as you believe it does anymore.
But here you are here, once again insinuating I'm a Jew because you would rather strawman my arguments to mean something else. Are you projecting here?
"Diversity" isn't their terminology. It's a word they hijacked.
I didn't say it was their terminology, I said it was one they chose. Can you even fucking read properly? It's clear you're articulate enough to most likely not be a nigger, so what exactly is your aim in ignoring what I've written and then rewriting it to fit a narrative I never have suggested? You have consistently done this many times now.
And exposing hypocrisy isn't "their method"
I didn't say it was their method. I never stated it was their method.
Care to suggest something?
This I've come up empty on. That doesn't mean that we don't try to think of something new.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] kneo24 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
That's not what I'm saying at all, but thanks for creating a strawman argument. You took one sentence, and ignored the greater context. Congrats.
Yeah, and most of them are less intelligent than their boomer parents. They're the millennials and gen xer's we're dealing with here. They're the same people who are only too happy to swallow what the media is telling them. They're a lost cause if you want to keep playing by the rules that they're accustomed to. Cognitive dissonance doesn't even register to them. The hypocrisy you point out is amusing for a second, then they ignore it. I've seen it time after time again. It's why we constantly see this "left versus right" divide. They blindly follow a side and forget about thinking critically quite often.
I imagine those numbers become less and less, not more and more. 5 years ago? You'd have a strong case. A year ago? Probably still a strong case. Again, look no further than the refugees we got here lately. Come up with a different game for them to follow.
You actually don't need to rebrand it to do that. They'll shout along the lines, "not all muslims!" and other nonsense and ignore you. Go ahead, try it. Tell us how far you get.
By using their chosen terminologies and their methods to expose them is exactly playing by their rules. And if you haven't noticed, the rules never apply to them.
Find a different method.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Your whole post sure sounds like defeatism.
The kids are Gen Z, not Gen X, and I would bet that Gen Zs and millennials constitute the majority on this site, so I'm not sure how they're a "lost cause". What's your solution? "The kids are dumb so just give them up."
I agree that when you're converting people away from a dominant cultural paradigm your gains diminish over time as you suck up all of the people who were mostly reasonable in the first place and only true believers and apathetic normalfags are left. But that doesn't mean you just stop, since there are new people (kids/teens) growing into their first age of reason every day. The moment an idea stops trying to influence new people is the moment it commits to death.
Yeah and getting them to shout and look stupid is pointless. Thanks Schlomo.
"Diversity" isn't their terminology. It's a word they hijacked. And exposing hypocrisy isn't "their method", as they're the biggest hypocrites in the world. It's universal.
Care to suggest something?
[–] kneo24 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
That's due to your inability to not understand context. I keep mentioning try a different avenue, as the current one doesn't work as well as you believe it to.
I never said the kids were Gen X. I was mentioning how the different generations seem to follow the same footsteps. I would wager the majority on this constitute Millennials and Gen X, with Gen Z being a minority. Again, my point about them being a lost cause is in reference to the tactics you wish to keep using. I'm not telling you to give up, I'm telling you to find a different way.
Why do you insist on misrepresenting what I've stated?
But I never said to stop. I said to try a different way. In the rest of the paragraph I didn't quote, you admit to diminishing returns.
Again, I ask why you insist on misrepresenting things.
You admitted already there was diminishing returns. Do you not remember what you write from one minute to the next? Getting them to do the same thing that we've been doing just simply doesn't work as well as you believe it does anymore.
But here you are here, once again insinuating I'm a Jew because you would rather strawman my arguments to mean something else. Are you projecting here?
I didn't say it was their terminology, I said it was one they chose. Can you even fucking read properly? It's clear you're articulate enough to most likely not be a nigger, so what exactly is your aim in ignoring what I've written and then rewriting it to fit a narrative I never have suggested? You have consistently done this many times now.
I didn't say it was their method. I never stated it was their method.
This I've come up empty on. That doesn't mean that we don't try to think of something new.