You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]kneo244 points
16 points
20 points
(+20|-4)
ago
Why? I imagine what they will do is redefine "speech diversity" as something else entirely. They already think diversity is "everyone is brown" and people of color as "everyone is brown". To them, diversity of thought is, "only black people should speak".
[+]Sockhereye2 points21 points23 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Sockhereye[S]2 points
21 points
23 points
(+23|-2)
ago
(edited ago)
It has major comedy potential.
It forces them to reject one of their own totemic words, even if just in a limited context. This will fuck with them.
There are clear analogies between Muslims, ghetto blacks, and other groups who are generally wrongthinkers by non-adjusted leftist standards, being included in diversity and other types of wrongthinkers (like us "nahtzees") being included in speech diversity. We can force them to confront the negative aspects of social diversity via analogy to the speech they already hate. Sure, the hardcore leftists will just handwave it away with some bullshit, but that'll make them look stupid and hypocritical to normies which is fun.
I posit the normies opinion doesn't matter that much anymore. Look no further than the boomers that arrived here and cried about racism and how it should not be allowed. They won't even stand for free speech because they were offended. The only thing you accomplish is making them look hypocritical and stupid to people who are already aware. It's fun for you, and maybe an amusement to others, but it's nothing new. It's not a novel idea like you're making it out to be.
Make them play by your rules instead of playing by theirs.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] kneo24 4 points 16 points 20 points (+20|-4) ago
Why? I imagine what they will do is redefine "speech diversity" as something else entirely. They already think diversity is "everyone is brown" and people of color as "everyone is brown". To them, diversity of thought is, "only black people should speak".
[–] Sockhereye [S] 2 points 21 points 23 points (+23|-2) ago (edited ago)
It has major comedy potential.
It forces them to reject one of their own totemic words, even if just in a limited context. This will fuck with them.
There are clear analogies between Muslims, ghetto blacks, and other groups who are generally wrongthinkers by non-adjusted leftist standards, being included in diversity and other types of wrongthinkers (like us "nahtzees") being included in speech diversity. We can force them to confront the negative aspects of social diversity via analogy to the speech they already hate. Sure, the hardcore leftists will just handwave it away with some bullshit, but that'll make them look stupid and hypocritical to normies which is fun.
[–] kneo24 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
I posit the normies opinion doesn't matter that much anymore. Look no further than the boomers that arrived here and cried about racism and how it should not be allowed. They won't even stand for free speech because they were offended. The only thing you accomplish is making them look hypocritical and stupid to people who are already aware. It's fun for you, and maybe an amusement to others, but it's nothing new. It's not a novel idea like you're making it out to be.
Make them play by your rules instead of playing by theirs.
[–] epik- 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
"Diversity of speech" sounds much better than 'diversity speech'
[–] AlaricTheFirst 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So crazy it may just work. I like “diversity of speech” though.
[–] NiggadermCQ ago
Eubonics is diverse speech.
We did du nuffin.