0
4

[–] theoldones 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

OP is complicit in the UKs boot-face-stomping.

i hope you enjoy getting arrested for wrongthink becuase you didnt prevent it happening the first time.

also, "twice convicted" when its convictions that were meant to silence wrongthink? GET FUCKED OP THATS NOT HOW THE LAW OUGHT TO BE USED

1
-1

[–] thelma [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Your have the court transcripts for both convictions' hearings?

I have not seen any posted.

Really, I would need to either a) hear a recording of the proceedings or b) copy of court transcripts

Its hard to say w/o reading these things. Why? Because courts go by evidence presented which might not correctly show the truth.

0
0

[–] theoldones 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

...that just makes the UK gov look EVEN MORE GUILTY and make it EVEN MORE LIKELY TOMMY GOT GULAGED

do you even think or do you just barf and words come out.

0
3

[–] the_sharpest_knife 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Sounds like Richard Spencer.

He still shouldn't be silenced if all he's doing is reporting.

1
0

[–] thelma [S] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

No one should be arrested for free speech .. but I don't think that's why he's in jail.

Still awaiting to see the court transcripts as opposed to hear-say.

0
2

[–] Talc 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

that's exactly why he's in jail, reporting on a case which has reporting restrictions on it.

0
2

[–] lemon11 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Maybe he did it on purpose. He was supposedly warned not to film on the steps of the courthouse. Maybe it was designed to generate outrage, rather than just from stupidity. Was the gag order predictable? It sounds like SOP there in some ways. He could have predicted it going this way.

0
2

[–] Talc 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Filming on courthouse steps is what they got him for last time, it means technically he was "inside" the property boundary of the court so could be held in contempt of court. This time he wasn't inside the court but was ignoring reporting restrictions so they got him for that instead. Bear in mind this is a local court to me, I've attended on multiple occasions as a witness, as the accused, and as a bodyguard for a girl whose ex bf stabbed her multiple times, so I know the layout pretty damn well.

With a bit more smarts and a bit of legal support he could have dodged this, he should have got a team preparing a a case to overturn the reporting restrictions and only recorded (not livestreamed) from outside the court so he had the material ready for when the restriction is overturned, then had his computer hacked to release the recording. instant no blame, no case to answer.

If I was Tommy now I'd be "putting an app in the box" (making a formal request to the prison) to ask to go on halal diet, just to confuse 'em all (and to make sure the ragheads in the jails can't poison his food without poisoning their own).

1
-1

[–] thelma [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I have worked with my state's judges for a clearly written policy concerning free speech activities in and about courthouses. They wrote one; it violates free speech in parts. I sued. Still waiting for the trial to commence. And I ignore the unlawful restrictions.

So as far as free speech and its limits, I'm on it. What people don't understand is that you can be exercising free speech and also violate a law at the same time.

Still have seen no video of the time where the alleged (and now found) crime(s) took place. Or of any court transcripts.

0
1

[–] middle_path 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I see no problem with what you're posting as long as you don't support raw state-sponsored censorship.

0
0

[–] thelma [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And I do not. I exercise my free speech all the time to provide evidence of government corruption.

0
0

[–] haveyoursafespace1 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

An odd opinion considering you're posting on voat.

0
1

[–] middle_path 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's a free speech platform, not a hugbox. OP is entitled to their opinions no matter how controversial.

0
0

[–] Mikel777 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

No one gives a fuck about what you think.

0
0

[–] thelma [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thank you for your post, hysterical woman.