You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

5
1

[–] I_Would_Gas_You 5 points 1 points (+6|-5) ago 

I just assume he is a angry self rightious person.

3
10

[–] truthwoke33 [S] 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago  (edited ago)

That would be nice but his argument pattern and structure is straight out the PRISM handbook. He is literally incapable of addressing a response directly, which even a brain dead SJW can do even if it is in a retarded way. Go ahead and try to get him to respond directly to anything about the Jews manipulating our government and and their role in flooding our nation's with Muslim and street shitters, he will just change the topic and deflect and then pretend the argument never happened the next day.

Hmm, now where did I read that last part before....

1
11

[–] albatrosv15 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago  (edited ago)

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

19
-13

[–] 9-11 19 points -13 points (+6|-19) ago  (edited ago)

The slightest expression of Christian faith or virtue signaling to Christian morality attracts shrill godless atheists like a pack of dogs. The stalk me and once they know you're Christian they want to constantly straw man you about every little thing because they're some angsty rebellious teen who hates their dad. It's w/e, but it results in a high percentage of my comments having to be "defensive" in nature, which as you know, defensive posts dont get many upvotes. I'm not self-righteous, i just find arguing with atheists about the only reason to come to this Den of Snakes called voat, maybe I come off that way but its truly not intended.

0
8

[–] R34p_Th3_Wh0r1w1nd 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

It's pen of goats. Not a den of snakes. If you are Christian, you are arguing with the wrong group. The pope is out to destroy your way of life. Somehow, instead of fighting that, you admittedly come to voat to argue with people who don't even believe as you do. It is waste of time and energy at best.

2
7

[–] I_Would_Gas_You 2 points 7 points (+9|-2) ago 

Why does it matter to you if someone is an atheist? Being a dick isn't going to change anyones mind. I mean it's voat so have your say but it seems like a miserable reason to come here.

0
4

[–] kammmmak 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I respect christians point blank and I am not one. But I don't respect you. Why the fuck are you turning this into a religio thing anyways. You look to be already changing OP's subject.

4
2

[–] Diggernicks 4 points 2 points (+6|-4) ago 

It's neat how everyone who disagrees with your viewpoint is a shill. Almost exactly like how everyone who disagrees with a liberal is a racist or a misogynist or an anti Semite. Funny how that works.